On 10/1/07, Matt McCutchen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If the remote filesystem supports efficient copying of a range of data
> from one offset to another, then #2 is moot and a smart client can do
> both pushes and pulls efficiently using your scheme and zsync's
> "reverse" delta-transfer algorit
On 9/30/07, Stephen Zemlicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, let's say this is the first sync and every file is being transferred.
> The checksum for each of the files is cached on the local drive. Then, the
> next time you sync, it checks the checksum from the cache against the file
> to be copi
Cc: rsync@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Mapped Drive
On 9/30/07, Stephen Zemlicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem is some files don't change in size. So I was hoping that the
> checksums could be cached. Perhaps I'm mistaken but I thought the
checksum
> determined what
On 9/30/07, Stephen Zemlicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem is some files don't change in size. So I was hoping that the
> checksums could be cached. Perhaps I'm mistaken but I thought the checksum
> determined what actual blocks were transferred. I suppose it could be
> cached at eith
transferring the
whole file via mapped drive.
regards
roland
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: "Stephen Zemlicka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Gesendet: 30.09.07 07:30:04
> An: "'Matt McCutchen'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: rsync@lists.sam
__
Stephen Zemlicka
Integrated Computer Technologies
PH. 608-558-5926
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
McCutchen
Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2007 5:03 PM
To: Stephen Zemlicka
Cc: rsync@lists.samba.org
Subject:
On 9/28/07, Stephen Zemlicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a way to have rsync cache the checksums for something like this and
> would that help?
I'm not sure exactly what you mean. You said you were using the -c
(--checksum) option, which makes rsync decide whether to update each
destina
On 9/28/07, Stephen Zemlicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would this still help for online
> storage though as most have much greater download bandwidth than upload. So
> it would basically download the file with your faster download speeds,
> compare, then upload the changes with your slower uplo
Behalf Of Matt
McCutchen
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 6:51 PM
To: Stephen Zemlicka
Cc: rsync@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Mapped Drive
On 9/24/07, Stephen Zemlicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think I got it (with the help of a friend). You can, in fact, rsync to
a
>
rsync@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Mapped Drive
On 9/24/07, Stephen Zemlicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think I got it (with the help of a friend). You can, in fact, rsync to
a
> mapped drive efficiently. You must include --no-whole-file. My 100MB
file
> only transferred a few MB usin
On 9/24/07, Stephen Zemlicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think I got it (with the help of a friend). You can, in fact, rsync to a
> mapped drive efficiently. You must include --no-whole-file. My 100MB file
> only transferred a few MB using that method and it opened up with the
> changes just
EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
McCutchen
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 12:46 PM
To: Stephen Zemlicka
Cc: rsync@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Mapped Drive
On 9/24/07, Stephen Zemlicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The reason I was trying this was because all I can do is map a drive. As
of
&
t: Re: Mapped Drive
On 9/24/07, Stephen Zemlicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The reason I was trying this was because all I can do is map a drive. As
of
> yet, I cannot modify the server like that.
If the only access you have to the remote directory is to read or
write it via a mapped
On 9/24/07, Stephen Zemlicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The reason I was trying this was because all I can do is map a drive. As of
> yet, I cannot modify the server like that.
If the only access you have to the remote directory is to read or
write it via a mapped drive, you can't hope to do an
2007 12:24 PM
To: Stephen Zemlicka
Cc: rsync@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Mapped Drive
On 9/24/07, Stephen Zemlicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What exactly is involved in the remote shell? Can this be done on a
windows
> to windows backup? Do you have a link handy otherwise goo
On 9/24/07, Stephen Zemlicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What exactly is involved in the remote shell? Can this be done on a windows
> to windows backup? Do you have a link handy otherwise google to the rescue.
> Thank you very much.
You set up an ssh server on the machine with the mapped drive
]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
McCutchen
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 12:09 PM
To: Stephen Zemlicka
Cc: rsync@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Mapped Drive
On 9/24/07, Stephen Zemlicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am havin
On Mon 24 Sep 2007, Stephen Zemlicka wrote:
> I am having trouble running rsync over a mapped drive. Basically it only
> copies whole files. I use the -rvcS switches. Any suggestions?
>From the manpage:
-W, --whole-file
With this option the incremental rsync algorithm is not u
On 9/24/07, Stephen Zemlicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am having trouble running rsync over a mapped drive. Basically it only
> copies whole files. I use the –rvcS switches. Any suggestions?
The delta-transfer algorithm reduces only the communication between
the sending and receiving rsync
19 matches
Mail list logo
