Re: Incremental backups

2006-06-01 Thread Wayne Davison
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 01:43:01PM +0200, Esteban Dugueperoux wrote: > As I want back up on DAT tapes I would like to have a full backup and > after some incremental backup with differences (modified or added files) > from latest backup (full or incremental backup) and not backup of olds > modif

Re: Incremental Backups

2005-02-19 Thread Joost van den Broek
On Thursday 17 February 2005 02:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I read the following hint at: > http://www.mikerubel.org/computers/rsync_snapshots/#Incremental > > mv backup.0 backup.1 > rsync -a --delete --link-dest=../backup.1 source_directory/ backup.0/ > > > I simply want to maintain a dated ba

Re: Incremental Backups

2005-02-17 Thread Wayne Davison
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 12:20:57PM -0600, Chris McKeever wrote: > so the chain goes > > hardlink a mirror directory to a new folder > rsync live data to a mirror directory > deleted files between the mirror/live data are then persistant in the > hardlinked daily directories Doing this can tweak t

Re: Incremental Backups

2005-02-17 Thread Hans-Juergen Beie
at 17.02.2005 2:24 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I read the following hint at: http://www.mikerubel.org/computers/rsync_snapshots/#Incremental mv backup.0 backup.1 rsync -a --delete --link-dest=../backup.1 source_directory/ backup.0/ I simply want to maintain a dated backup of a server so that I could

Re: Incremental Backups

2005-02-17 Thread Chris McKeever
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:02:07 -0800, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 08:24:54PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > It seems that this method would not use terribly much space in terms of > > duplicating files, however I am not sure of the --delete portion > > In

Re: Incremental Backups

2005-02-17 Thread Wayne Davison
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 08:24:54PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > It seems that this method would not use terribly much space in terms of > duplicating files, however I am not sure of the --delete portion In your command sequence, you are (properly) moving the existing hierarchy of files out o

Re: Incremental Backups

2005-02-17 Thread Chris McKeever
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:20:53 +0100, Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed 16 Feb 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > I simply want to maintain a dated backup of a server so that I could > > always go back to a certain date. I would like to keep this structure > > for each day for th

Re: Incremental Backups

2005-02-17 Thread Paul Slootman
On Wed 16 Feb 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I simply want to maintain a dated backup of a server so that I could > always go back to a certain date. I would like to keep this structure > for each day for the last seven days, then one weekly snapshot for each > week in the month and then e

RE: Incremental backups and batch mode.

2002-03-30 Thread Diego Liziero
>You're using the wrong tool -- you want a binary diff program instead. >Run that on your files, then rsync/tar/cp/whatever the diffs. Not exactly, I need the rsync algorithm to check the new version of the file against the checksums of that file calculated when the previous backup was made, and

RE: Incremental backups and batch mode.

2002-03-30 Thread Diego Liziero
>Ah... now I see. Unfortunately, this one's over my head. Can anyone else >help here? Can rsync deal explicitly with parts of files? The rsync program can deal with delta files, but just in the batch mode, unfortunately it is not exactly what I need. The rsync algorithm instead is exaclty wha

Re: Incremental backups and batch mode.

2002-03-30 Thread Adrian Ho
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 09:06:59PM +, Diego Liziero wrote: > So at every backup the whole 2Gbyte file is saved. That's exactly what rsync's supposed to do, AIUI. I would be /very/ upset if it didn't make perfect copies. 8-) > So I would like to use the rsync algorithm to calculate the diff

RE: Incremental backups and batch mode.

2002-03-28 Thread Mike Rubel
Diego wrote: > Right, wonderful, but let's consider a big database file, let's say > a 2Gbyte file, that is slightly changed every day of about a 10% ... > So at every backup the whole 2Gbyte file is saved. ... > So I would like to use the rsync algorithm to calculate the differences > (delta fi

RE: Incremental backups and batch mode.

2002-03-28 Thread Diego Liziero
Thanks, now I know how rsync backup option works. But I haven't been so clear about what I would like to do. >> I would like to have a first snapshot (level 0) that is a complete copy, >> and then other incremental backups that are just delta files >> (just the differences from the level 0 snaps

RE: Incremental backups and batch mode.

2002-03-28 Thread Mike Rubel
> Something similar: > I would like to have a first snapshot (level 0) that is a complete copy, > and then other incremental backups that are just delta files > (just the differences from the level 0 snapshot). The "normal" utilities for this job would be dump and tar, especially if you're dumpi