RE: Human readable output

2005-11-15 Thread Tony
Christoph Biedl Tuesday, November 15, 2005 4:20 AM > > Manuel L?pez-Ib??ez wrote... > > > I vote for this feature. In du and df commands, this is invoked with: > > -h, --human-readable > > print sizes in human readable format (e.g., 1K 234M 2G) > > > > --si likewise, but use powers of 1000 n

Re: Human readable output

2005-11-15 Thread Christoph Biedl
Manuel L?pez-Ib??ez wrote... > I vote for this feature. In du and df commands, this is invoked with: > -h, --human-readable > print sizes in human readable format (e.g., 1K 234M 2G) > > --si likewise, but use powers of 1000 not 1024 > > Currently, in rsync, -h is the short form of --help.

Re: Human readable output

2005-11-14 Thread Wayne Davison
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 05:51:57AM -0600, John Van Essen wrote: > What would you say about overloading the -h option? After thinking about it for a bit, I like your idea. I've changed -h to be the short-version of the --human-readable option, and added some backward-compatibility code that makes

Re: Human readable output

2005-11-14 Thread John Van Essen
On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 12:12:28 -0800, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The CVS version now has the options --human-readable (-m) and --si to > implement more human-reable output in the --stats and the end-of-run > summary. Anyone wanting to be able to use -h instead of -m (to make the >

Re: Human readable output

2005-11-13 Thread Martin Geisler
Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 01:18:22AM +0100, Martin Geisler wrote: >> I would like to suggest an option to rsync that makes it output sizes >> in human readable units, instead of always using bytes. > > The CVS version now has the options --human-readable (

Re: Human readable output

2005-11-12 Thread Wayne Davison
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 01:18:22AM +0100, Martin Geisler wrote: > I would like to suggest an option to rsync that makes it output sizes > in human readable units, instead of always using bytes. The CVS version now has the options --human-readable (-m) and --si to implement more human-reable output

Re: Human readable output

2005-11-06 Thread Martin Geisler
Manuel López-Ibáñez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I vote for this feature. In du and df commands, this is invoked with: > -h, --human-readable > print sizes in human readable format (e.g., 1K 234M 2G) > > --si likewise, but use powers of 1000 not 1024 Exactly, it is from those commands tha

Re: Human readable output

2005-11-05 Thread Eberhard Moenkeberg
Hi, On Sun, 6 Nov 2005, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote: I vote for this feature. In du and df commands, this is invoked with: -h, --human-readable print sizes in human readable format (e.g., 1K 234M 2G) --si likewise, but use powers of 1000 not 1024 Currently, in rsync, -h is the short form o

Re: Human readable output

2005-11-05 Thread Manuel López-Ibáñez
I vote for this feature. In du and df commands, this is invoked with: -h, --human-readable print sizes in human readable format (e.g., 1K 234M 2G) --si likewise, but use powers of 1000 not 1024 Currently, in rsync, -h is the short form of --help. Cheers, Manuel. Martin Geisler w