Re: Fwd: Re: setting checksum_seed

2004-05-19 Thread Wayne Davison
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 10:21:04PM -0700, Craig Barratt wrote: > Probably the best solution is to add a flag argument to sum_init(void) > to request whether to add checksum_seed or not. How about this similar idea: change sum_init() to take a seed value as an arg. Then, call it with sum_init(0)

Re: Fwd: Re: setting checksum_seed

2004-05-18 Thread Craig Barratt
Wayne Davison writes: > On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 02:25:11PM -0700, Craig Barratt wrote: > > Any feedback on this patch and the possibility of getting it > > into CVS or the patches directory? > > The file checksum-seed.diff was put into the patches dir on the 2nd of > May. Strangely, I don't seem

Re: Fwd: Re: setting checksum_seed

2004-05-16 Thread Craig Barratt
Wayne Davison writes: > On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 02:25:11PM -0700, Craig Barratt wrote: > > Any feedback on this patch and the possibility of getting it > > into CVS or the patches directory? > > The file checksum-seed.diff was put into the patches dir on the 2nd of > May. Strangely, I don't seem

Re: Fwd: Re: setting checksum_seed

2004-05-16 Thread Wayne Davison
On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 02:25:11PM -0700, Craig Barratt wrote: > Any feedback on this patch and the possibility of getting it > into CVS or the patches directory? The file checksum-seed.diff was put into the patches dir on the 2nd of May. Strangely, I don't seem to have sent any email indicating