Re: Feature Request: Multiple Streams

2004-03-11 Thread Jos Backus
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 04:08:49PM -0800, Clint Byrum wrote: > This looks very promising. I have two concerns: > > 1) how bad is it if one of the batch destinations isn't exactly like the > original's destination was? Are we talking corruption, or will it say > "You screwed up, try again!" ? The

Re: Feature Request: Multiple Streams

2004-03-11 Thread Clint Byrum
On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 02:24, Stefan Nehlsen wrote: > You have one source and many destinations. This looks to me like you > want to use the batch options of rsync. > > Please read about batch mode in the rsync manpage. > This looks very promising. I have two concerns: 1) how bad is it if one of

Re: Feature Request: Multiple Streams

2004-03-11 Thread Stefan Nehlsen
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 03:40:15PM -0800, Clint Byrum wrote: > I know thats what I'd want. I have one source server, that rsyncs the > same 3GB of random files to over 20 machines a few times a day. You have one source and many destinations. This looks to me like you want to use the batch options

Re: Feature Request: Multiple Streams

2004-03-10 Thread Tim Conway
Oh, that. There was a lot of talk about it, but it hasn't happened within rsync. I ended up writing my own client-server model utility in perl. We had a master copy of a distribution of EDI tools and views - 170GB or so in a couple million files, as I recall, and we had to keep up around 20

Re: Feature Request: Multiple Streams

2004-03-09 Thread Wayne Davison
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 02:09:29PM -0700, Robertson, Jason V wrote: > Are there any plans to add support for multiple stream copying (BBFTP > and GridFTP do this, though only for a single file) to rsync? Nope. It would be better to work on a replacement for rsync that had support for multiple-str

Re: Feature Request: Multiple Streams

2004-03-09 Thread Clint Byrum
On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 14:15, Jim Salter wrote: > Tim Conway wrote: > > > for source in source1 source2 source3 > > do > > rsync -options $source destination:$source & > > done > > wait > > > > adapt as needed. > > That will WORK, of course, but it does require tha

Re: Feature Request: Multiple Streams

2004-03-09 Thread Jim Salter
Tim Conway wrote: for source in source1 source2 source3 do rsync -options $source destination:$source & done wait adapt as needed. That will WORK, of course, but it does require that you do a file list build and compare for each of the above, instead of doing a sin

Re: Feature Request: Multiple Streams

2004-03-09 Thread Tim Conway
for source in source1 source2 source3 do rsync -options $source destination:$source & done wait adapt as needed. Tim Conway Unix System Administration Contractor - IBM Global Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Robertson, Jason V" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL P