>> Is there a way to take advantage of incremental, even if it means
>> running rsync twice?
>
>You can use --ignore-existing --ignore-non-existing --del to perform an
>incremental deletion run:
>
>--existing, --ignore-non-existing
> This tells rsync to skip creating files (including directories)
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 11:29:21AM +0100, Fabian Cenedese wrote:
> --delete-before receiver deletes before transfer (default)
The man page was lagging behind. I've checked in a fix. Thanks!
> Is there a way to take advantage of incremental, even if it means
> running rsync twice?
You c
Sorry Matt for mailing you personally.
At 03:58 08.01.2009 -0500, you wrote:
>On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 09:42 +0100, Fabian Cenedese wrote:
>> I have a backup on a NAS that is quite full. So when I try to backup
>> changed stuff it may run out of space, but only because rsync may
>> try to write a new
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 09:42 +0100, Fabian Cenedese wrote:
> I have a backup on a NAS that is quite full. So when I try to backup
> changed stuff it may run out of space, but only because rsync may
> try to write a new file before deleting the old one. That not only means
> changed files in the same
