Re: CVE-2007-4091

2007-09-04 Thread Dan Pritts
for the record, in case anyone else is looking, Redhat claims that their systems are not vulnerable. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2007-4091#c1 On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 11:12:08AM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote: > On Thu 30 Aug 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Thu, 30 Aug 2007 01

Re: CVE-2007-4091

2007-08-30 Thread Paul Slootman
On Thu 30 Aug 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Thu, 30 Aug 2007 01:41:01 -0400, danno wrote: > > http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2007-4091 > > http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2007-4091 > > SUSE has provided fixed RPMs for SUSE 10.0 - 10.2 some days ago. > But rsync's cvs

Re: CVE-2007-4091

2007-08-29 Thread Sven . Hartrumpf
Thu, 30 Aug 2007 01:41:01 -0400, danno wrote: > http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2007-4091 > http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2007-4091 SUSE has provided fixed RPMs for SUSE 10.0 - 10.2 some days ago. But rsync's cvs sources do not contain the string "4091", yet. Ciao Sve