On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 01:08:02PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
> So, perhaps it should be moved into the -a collection?
I've certainly considered it. My main hesitation is not wanting to
adversely effect existing rsync users. I haven't currently decided that
I want to do this.
One alternative t
On Fri 24 Feb 2006, Wayne Davison wrote:
> So, these days -H should be nice and fast.
So, perhaps it should be moved into the -a collection?
Paul Slootman
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/sma
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 10:20:48AM -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> I had the understanding that -H used an O(n^2) algorithm to match up
> hard links and it would be prohibitively expensive to use this option on
> a filesystem with about 100,000 files. Is this true?
It used to be true, but is not a
