I mean completely unchanged : file content, access rights, ACL... nothing
changed at all.
It looks like rsync does not go into xattr attributes to see if ACL already
exists and is the same, so thinks that the file is different and re-create it.
If you do the test I give in my bug report, executi
On Mon, 23 May 2011 19:45:57 +0200, AZ 9901 wrote:
> Well, when using -A (--acls), same (unchanged) files between 2 rsync
> runs are not linked together. Removing -A (--acls) makes things fine,
> files are hard linked together.
Where you write "unchanged", do you mean completely unchanged or do y
Hello Andrew,
Thank you for your answer !
Well, when using -A (--acls), same (unchanged) files between 2 rsync runs are
not linked together.
Removing -A (--acls) makes things fine, files are hard linked together.
I opened a bug relative to that and gave a quick "script" (Comment 3) to
reproduc
On Sun, 08 May 2011 18:21:23 +0200, AZ 9901 wrote:
[...]
> So why Rsync does not hard link them ?
If I understand what you're asking correctly, you've two files that are
identical but for the ACLs which are different. You're asking why these
two files aren't hard-linked?
The answer is that th
