Marc Perkel wrote:
> Seems to me it should warn but continue to copy the files anyway ignoring
> the ACLs.
Not necessarily. Failing to copy the ACLs could result in an insufficiently
protected file. In that case, better to not copy w/o the ACLs.
And that's just an example off the top of my hea
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 07:57:58AM -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
> send_acl: sys_acl_get_file(mysql, SMB_ACL_TYPE_ACCESS): Operation not
> supported
Yes, that's one of the horrific things about the current --acls patch,
and one of the reasons why it is not included by default in rsync. At
some point
