>> i think stdout as
>> rsync -avvP MCI/ MCI2 --stats --delete 1>1.txt
>> doesn't give me the 6c6c on the command line nor in the 1.txt
>>
>> rsync -avvP MCI/ MCI2 --stats --delete 2>1.txt
>> leaves an empty 1.txt.
>
> If that is the right syntax for your shell (it is for bash)
> then it isn't comi
>> i think stdout as
>> rsync -avvP MCI/ MCI2 --stats --delete 1>1.txt
>> doesn't give me the 6c6c on the command line nor in the 1.txt
>>
>> rsync -avvP MCI/ MCI2 --stats --delete 2>1.txt
>> leaves an empty 1.txt.
>
> If that is the right syntax for your shell (it is for bash)
> then it isn't comi
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 03:59:07PM +0100, Philipp W. wrote:
> > However RH7.3 would i think have a very old version of
> > rsync. I'd start by upgrading. Certainly there isn't much
> > value of anyone spelunking the current code to fix a problem
> > that might already be fixed.
>
> it was 2.5.4,
> However RH7.3 would i think have a very old version of
> rsync. I'd start by upgrading. Certainly there isn't much
> value of anyone spelunking the current code to fix a problem
> that might already be fixed.
it was 2.5.4, now i compiled 2.5.6
with the same issues...
> You didn't say if this
Sending direct to me what should be going to the list is a
sure way to get a low priority in my queue.
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 03:02:47PM +0100, Philipp W. wrote:
> > Very strange. My first thought was a bad terminal settting
> > and oddly enough u8 (user string 8) could do that but i
> > can't s
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 02:02:06PM +0100, Philipp W. wrote:
> Has anyone an idea why i always get
>
> 6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c
