Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 10:15:55AM -0500, Misha Bergal wrote:
>> rsync on the server machine makes System process to consume about 90%
>> of CPU time.
>
> If you are sending over a fast network, using -W (--whole-file) will
> save you CPU (and disk I/O).
> Is it a known problem? Is anybody else having it too? What steps do I
need
> to take to resolve it?
Maybe you have same problem like I
Cygwin sleep() is messing something with windows threads
Posted already to cygwin mailing list
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2005-08/msg01136.html
Raul Metsma
On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 10:15:55AM -0500, Misha Bergal wrote:
> rsync on the server machine makes System process to consume about 90%
> of CPU time.
If you are sending over a fast network, using -W (--whole-file) will
save you CPU (and disk I/O). In addition (or alternately), if you're
using an e
Hi,
For the past day I've been trying to set up file synchronization between two
Windows 2000 servers
using rsync 2.6.6 (distributed in cwRsync package - http://www.itefix.no).
Unfortunately I've encountered
a major showstopper - rsync on the server machine makes System process to
consume about
Hi,
About the patches for speeding up rsync with windows. Could you send me
the patched binaries?
Thanks,
Adam
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 02:25:59PM -0600, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
>file has vanished:
>"/cygdrive/z/LJ 430/Completed Orders/513000/513476 \
>Tassone Mary no Cd/ART/high res/59?04.tif"
I can only suggest trying to debug this (perhaps via strace, perhaps via
fprintf(stderr,
Anyone have any suggestions / solutions for the problem I'm having
with rsync on a win32 machine that I posted last week? You can read the
archived message here:
http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2004-September/010582.html
--
W | I haven't lost my mind; it's backed up on tape somewhere
The setup:
File Server with Windows 2000 Server: shares multiple drives to
a large network consisting of both Macs and PCs.
Macs run OS9 and OSX.
Backup Server with Windows 2003 Server: has Cygwin installed so
I can use rsync (which is included with C
If you download gcc with cygwin, the compilation
procedure is exactly the same as under *nix. As for
the cygwin1.dll problems, I don't know how compatible
the different versions are, but I assume the API is
pretty fixed. I don't think you can link cygwin
statically.
In the past there are known
> I've only ever used used gcc on *nix, what's
> involved in compiling them
> myself on Win32? Unless rsync can be compiled
> statically, I'll have to
> somehow keep it compatible with the installed Cygwin
> DLLs (??).
>
> Any idea if this patch is planned for inclusion in
> the official Cygwin
>
> If you don't want to apply all the patches, contact
> me, and I'll send you patched sources or a binary that
> works for me under win2k (though I haven't tried the
> patches under linux).
I've only ever used used gcc on *nix, what's involved in compiling them
myself on Win32? Unless rsync can b
Hi Scott,
On this mailinglist, there is a thread called "Rsync
performance increase through buffering". The first
post in that thread, by Craig Barratt, contains a
number of patches that increases the transfer speed *a
lot* under windows/cygwin. Applying this patch alone,
however, hangs rsync, so
Server is Linux, client multi-boots Windows and Linux. rsync v2.5.5,
Windows 2K/XP, Linux 2.2.
Under Windows, it takes *forever* to receive the file list, and once
transfer is in progress gets under 1MB/s, compared to 6-8MB/s when booted to
Linux. Manual copy via SMB works at full speed regardl
On the 'resources' area of the rsync website, I found a link
to a quick howto on using rsync with cygnus. After a quick
look over it, I found something that might be useful --
the doc says to create a special batchfile for rsync, to
pass it the correct environment. In fact, I see no conflict
bet
14 matches
Mail list logo
