RE: working on a 2.5.6pre1 release

2003-01-10 Thread Green, Paul
Dave Dykstra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > 3. The Stratus VOS port is failing all 3 daemon tests in code >that is used just for testing, saying it can't create the test >socket. I don't know if there's a corresponding problem in the >corresponding non-test code. The socketpair_t

Re: working on a 2.5.6pre1 release

2003-01-10 Thread Dave Dykstra
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 12:46:13AM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote: > On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 05:09:07PM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote: > > I'm stuck on a problem that some machines on build.samba.org are > > showing on the 'chgrp' test. > > I've checked in a fix for this bug. Thanks, Wayne! Great work.

Re: working on a 2.5.6pre1 release

2003-01-10 Thread Wayne Davison
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 12:46:13AM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote: > This is significant because -vvv is needed for the receiver to try to > do IO after killing off the generator. This IO would sometimes fail > if the generator died before [the IO] finished. For the anal, I mixed up the generator and

Re: working on a 2.5.6pre1 release

2003-01-10 Thread Wayne Davison
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 05:09:07PM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote: > I'm stuck on a problem that some machines on build.samba.org are > showing on the 'chgrp' test. I've checked in a fix for this bug. Here's what I discovered: The reason only the chgrp test failed is that it is the only test that use

Re: working on a 2.5.6pre1 release

2003-01-09 Thread Wayne Davison
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 05:09:07PM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote: > It's very hard to debug because it is a timing problem and because it > happens after rprintf handling is already shut down in the child process. Fortunately fprintf(stderr, ...) always works, even in the child process. This is what I

Re: working on a 2.5.6pre1 release

2003-01-09 Thread jw schultz
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 05:09:07PM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote: > I'm working on trying to get rsync 2.5.6pre1 available for people to > test more widely. I'm out of time for today, and I'm stuck on a problem > that some machines on build.samba.org are showing on the 'chgrp' test. > I can reproduce