On Thu 20 Dec 2012, Ryan John wrote:
> On Thu 20 Dec 2012, Ryan John wrote:
> >>
> >> The umask would be preferable to using --chmod. Is that possible?
>
> > Don't you just want to use -a instead of -r in your options to rsync?
> > That will include -p that will preserve permissions from the sou
From: Paul Slootman [paul+rs...@wurtel.net]
Sent: Thursday, 20 December 2012 12:40 PM
To: rsync@lists.samba.org
Cc: Ryan John
Subject: Re: rsync without POSIX ACLs
On Thu 20 Dec 2012, Ryan John wrote:
>>
>> The umask would be preferable to u
On Thu 20 Dec 2012, Ryan John wrote:
>
> The umask would be preferable to using --chmod. Is that possible?
Don't you just want to use -a instead of -r in your options to rsync?
That will include -p that will preserve permissions from the source.
Paul
--
Please use reply-all for most replies t
John
From: ericbamba...@discover.com [ericbamba...@discover.com]
Sent: Thursday, 20 December 2012 12:26 AM
To: Ryan John
Cc: rsync@lists.samba.org; rsync-boun...@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: rsync without POSIX ACLs
Ryan,
I'm not sure what you expect to happen
Ryan,
I'm not sure what you expect to happen since for most filesystems
there is no concept of "permission inheritance" in unix-like operating
systems. Rather, newly created files obey the currently set umask (usually
022). Are you saying you want rsync to use your current umask instead
