OK it is the text dump, uncompressed, looks like the new maint. plan does a
rebuild index then a reorganize index. Of course I do not know a lot about
SQL, but when I watch the rsync run most of the data is generated in the
last 25% of the run, I know the data is the same in there but maybe now it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
When you say an SQL database dump do you mean you are rsyncing the raw
text file or are you compressing it? If you are compressing it you
might want to try gzip with the --rsyncable patch as it can
significantly improve rsync's ability to delta-xfer c
On 6/15/06, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 11:50:52AM -0400, Surer Dink wrote:
> Is this because I am using -H and --delete? What is the per-file
> overhead when both of these options are used?
It depends on what version of rsync you're using. Older versions w
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 11:50:52AM -0400, Surer Dink wrote:
> Is this because I am using -H and --delete? What is the per-file
> overhead when both of these options are used?
It depends on what version of rsync you're using. Older versions would
allocate an additional file list for --delete, and
The company I work for uses rsync for backups from client computers,
the memory usage is a problem for a lot of them since they're already
busy doing other important things (databases, web serving, etc).
From the FAQ:
out of memory
The usual reason for "out of memory" when running rsync is t
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 01:13:23AM -0500, Matthew S. Hallacy wrote:
> Unfortunately there's no indication of who needs a spare week of
> coding time, or how much a week would cost.
That's a really old comment, so I'm not sure if it was written by Martin
Pool or Dave Dykstra or someone else. I'm
Lutz: This has been a frequent topic of discussion. Wayne Davidson (and
probably others) is working on a different way, but currently, this method
is integral to rsync, and to change it will be a major revision. For my
application, I actually had to write my own syncronization program that
> " " == Cameron Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The other day I was moving a lot of data from one spot to
> another. About 12G in several 2G files. Anyway, I interrupted
> the transfer because I'd chosen a fairly slow way of doing it,
> and wanted to pick up where
Cameron Simpson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] writes:
>| Cameron> The other day I was moving a lot of data from one spot to
>| Cameron> another. About 12G in several 2G files. [...]
>| Cameron> so I used rsync so that its checksumming could speed past
>| Cameron> the partially copied file.
| Cameron> The other day I was moving a lot of data from one spot to
| Cameron> another. About 12G in several 2G files. [...]
| Cameron> so I used rsync so that its checksumming could speed past
| Cameron> the partially copied file. It spent a long time
| Cameron> transferring
> "Cameron" == Cameron Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Cameron> The other day I was moving a lot of data from one spot to
Cameron> another. About 12G in several 2G files. Anyway, I
Cameron> interrupted the transfer because I'd chosen a fairly slow
Cameron> way of doing it
11 matches
Mail list logo
