No.
On Sun, Aug 07, 2022 at 06:49:45AM +0200, Fourhundred Thecat via rsync wrote:
> Hello,
>
> is there any difference/advantage between these two commands?
>
> rsync --rsh="ssh -l root" my-host.com
> rsync r...@my-host.com
>
> thank you,
>
> --
> Please use reply
Hello,
is there any difference/advantage between these two commands?
rsync --rsh="ssh -l root" my-host.com
rsync r...@my-host.com
thank you,
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 06:59:41PM +0200, Eran Tromer wrote:
> It would have been a simple script with the extension I proposed
> ("create batch without patching",
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg09757.html).
Fwiw, I think adding this extension is a good idea.
--
Jos Backus
Hi,
It would have been a simple script with the extension I proposed
("create batch without patching",
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg09757.html).
Alternatively, you can use librsync's rdiff. That lets you can save the
patch information to a file and then transmit it only if it'
hi,
So I have two machines that rsync over an ADSL network. This works fine,
except on certain times when we get too much new data. They it takes
far too long to backup this way.
What I would like to do is have the output from rsync go to a USB drive,
so I can just take to the backup server a
