On Wed 09 Oct 2024, McDowell, Blake via rsync wrote:
> Linux servers one running TrueNAS-13.0-U6 and the other running
> TrueNAS-13.0-U3.1.
>
> I connect to both on a Mac via smb over fiber.
>
> Using cp -a also updates the timestamp of the copied file to today and does
> not back-date it to t
conservator/archivist, so I
may be missing something obvious.
-Blake
From: Kevin Korb
Date: Wednesday, October 9, 2024 at 15:01
To: McDowell, Blake , rsync@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Question About Rsync and Modification Times
External Email - Exercise Caution
That isn't how rsync s
a.org
*Subject: *Re: Question About Rsync and Modification Times
External Email - Exercise Caution
You are using rsync -a which copies (preserves) the timestamp. Meaning
that rsync will copy the file then back-date it to the timestamp of the
source file. Most copying tools do not do this though cp
Date: Wednesday, October 9, 2024 at 14:45
To: rsync@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Question About Rsync and Modification Times
External Email - Exercise Caution
You are using rsync -a which copies (preserves) the timestamp. Meaning
that rsync will copy the file then back-date it to the timestamp
You are using rsync -a which copies (preserves) the timestamp. Meaning
that rsync will copy the file then back-date it to the timestamp of the
source file. Most copying tools do not do this though cp's -a does it
too. Note that your itemized output says that the timestamp is
different meanin
Hello,
I have a question about how/why rsync updates modification times, which I
haven’t been able to find an answer to.
I have two locally connected storage devices running TrueNAS Core: one is new
and empty, while the other is filled with files.
When I run the following rsync command:
rsync
On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 05:56:28PM +0200, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 16:00:47 +0100 Chris Green via rsync wrote:
>
> > I run a daily backup using 'rsync -a -F '
>
> > I want to exclude everything in ~/.local/share **except** the file:-
>
> >/home/chr
On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 11:12:54 -0700 Ian Z via rsync wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 05:56:28PM GMT, Francis.Montagnac--- via rsync wrote:
>> No. Assuming you are doing this backup from your homedir, you should
>> add to your .rsync-filter file:
>> + /.local/
>> + /.local/share/
>> + /.loca
On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 05:56:28PM GMT, Francis.Montagnac--- via rsync wrote:
> > I want to exclude everything in ~/.local/share **except** the file:-
> >/home/chris/.local/share/evolution/calendar/system/calendar.ics
> > I have the following in my rsync-filter file to exclude ~/.local/share
Hi.
On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 16:00:47 +0100 Chris Green via rsync wrote:
> I run a daily backup using 'rsync -a -F '
> I want to exclude everything in ~/.local/share **except** the file:-
>/home/chris/.local/share/evolution/calendar/system/calendar.ics
> I have the following in my rsync-fil
I run a daily backup using 'rsync -a -F '
I want to exclude everything in ~/.local/share **except** the file:-
/home/chris/.local/share/evolution/calendar/system/calendar.ics
I have the following in my rsync-filter file to exclude ~/.local/share
- .local/share
Can I simply add the fol
Yes, cpio -l can be useful since cpio can easily operate on the output
from the very capable find command.
On 9/4/21 8:34 PM, Dan Stromberg wrote:
>
> I was thinking --link-dest too.
>
> Sometimes this can be done with cpio too; check out the -pdlv options.
>
> On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 4:57 PM Ke
I was thinking --link-dest too.
Sometimes this can be done with cpio too; check out the -pdlv options.
On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 4:57 PM Kevin Korb via rsync
wrote:
> Rsync does almost everything cp does but since it is designed to network
> it never got that feature. I was thinking maybe --link-
Rsync does almost everything cp does but since it is designed to network
it never got that feature. I was thinking maybe --link-dest could be
tortured into doing it but if it can I can't figure out how. BTW, you
have some pointless dots in there.
On 9/4/21 6:41 PM, L A Walsh via rsync wrote:
> I
I noticed in looking at download dirs for a project, that
another mirror had "crept-in" for usage (where different mirrors
are stored under mirror-URL names). To copy over the diffs,
normally I'd do:
rsync -uav dir1/. dir2/.
(where dir1="the new mirror that I'd switched
to by accident, and dir2=
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Jason Keltz wrote:
> As far as I understand, even though rsync is running on the client, the
> server is trying to write the batch file locally?
>
No, the batch file is always output by whatever side is running the rsync
command. You either need to specify a pat
Hi.
I have a question about the use of the rsync batch capability with
--read-batch and --write-batch/--only-write-batch.
On my rsync server, where I am running rsync in daemon mode, I make a
tree available to my client.
The client has rsynced the entire tree from the server. So far, so good.
> Object: Re: Question about rsync and BIG mirror
Thanks for all your answers and advices. My problem seems on the side of
the 2MB line one time the whole 190GB data are synchronised. I will keep
in touch and give some feedbacks.
Thanks for all
--
To unsubscribe or change options: ht
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> >While you're there, one little trick I've found that speeds up
> >scanning large directory hierarchies is to stat() or open() entries in
> >inode-number order. For some filesystems it makes no difference, but
> >for others it reduces the average disk seek time as on many
Jamie Lokier wrote:
>While you're there, one little trick I've found that speeds up
>scanning large directory hierarchies is to stat() or open() entries in
>inode-number order. For some filesystems it makes no difference, but
>for others it reduces the average disk seek time as on many common
>fi
Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 07:18:45PM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> > In fact, I know of at least one place where they don't use rsync because
> > they don't have enough RAM+SWAP to hold the list of files in memory.
> >
> > As far as future directions for rsync, I think this
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> >Hmm. My home directory, on my laptop (a mere 60GB disk), does contain
> >millions of files, and it takes about 20 minutes to build the list on
> >a good day. 100Mbps network, but it's I/O bound not network bound.
> >
> >It looks a lot like the number of files is more sig
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 07:18:45PM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> In fact, I know of at least one place where they don't use rsync because
> they don't have enough RAM+SWAP to hold the list of files in memory.
>
> As far as future directions for rsync, I think this is the major place
> where rsyn
Jamie Lokier wrote:
>Hmm. My home directory, on my laptop (a mere 60GB disk), does contain
>millions of files, and it takes about 20 minutes to build the list on
>a good day. 100Mbps network, but it's I/O bound not network bound.
>
>It looks a lot like the number of files is more significant tha
jp wrote:
> 100gb of 4-40MB files sounds like my home PC full of digital photos I've
> taken. It backs up to a linux PC right beside it with rsync. I don't
> really call it that big a project for rsync. Big things for rsync are
> millions of files. At 100mbps, it takes a few seconds to build the
100gb of 4-40MB files sounds like my home PC full of digital photos I've
taken. It backs up to a linux PC right beside it with rsync. I don't
really call it that big a project for rsync. Big things for rsync are
millions of files. At 100mbps, it takes a few seconds to build the list.
I use the
> -Message d'origine-
> De : BOYE Johan
> Envoyé : lundi 6 mars 2006 08:28
> À : 'Jan-Benedict Glaw'
> Objet : RE: Question about rsync and BIG mirror
>
>
> > I'm preparing a plan for a production mode in my company: we need to
>
; From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 1:03 AM
> To: rsync@lists.samba.org
> Subject: Question about rsync and BIG mirror
>
>
> // I wonder if this message has been posted, so I sent it again //
>
&
On Fri, 2006-03-03 08:02:55 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> // I wonder if this message has been posted, so I sent it again //
It was, but nobody answered yet.
> I'm preparing a plan for a production mode in my company: we need to
> mirror around 100GB of data trough a spe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hello,
>
> So: each night, from 0:00am to maximum 7:00am, the server will have to
>check the 100Go of files and see what files have been modified, then,
>upload them to the clients. Each file is around 4MB to 40MB in average.
>
>
Are the clients what you call the "mir
// I wonder if this message has been posted, so I sent it again //
Hello,
I'm quite a n00b on rsync stuff but I went to the website, read
FAQ/how-to, Google and more, I setup my own rsync server and clients:
everything works fine :-D
I'm preparing a plan for a production mode in my company:
Hello,
I'm quite a n00b on rsync stuff but I went to the website, read
FAQ/how-to, Google and more, I setup my own rsync server and clients:
everything works fine :-D
I'm preparing a plan for a production mode in my company: we need to
mirror around 100GB of data trough a special VPN internet
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 03:47:47AM +, Guo jing wrote:
> As you said, if the source file reduced and the blocks were occupied by
> other files there will be a file with other file's content and a abnormal
> end on the other end.
No, the OS doesn't work that way. Rsync will instead copy lots
On 7 Jun 2004, Guo jing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for your answer!
> Yes,my question is that if we can get a good result when the file is
> changing while it is being copied by rsync
>
> In my test, if the file is being augmented while it been copied using
> rsync.I can get a normal
Thanks for your answer!
Yes,my question is that if we can get a good result when the file is
changing while it is being copied by rsync
In my test, if the file is being augmented while it been copied using
rsync.I can get a normal copy on the other end and the result file is the
same as what
On 31 May 2004, Guo jing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hello,
> I am a student in China.I like the linux and usually use the rsync to
> backup my documents. Last week when I use it,I find a question I want to
> discuss with you.
>
> The condition is like this: The source file that I want to rs
hello,
I am a student in China.I like the linux and usually use the rsync to
backup my documents. Last week when I use it,I find a question I want to
discuss with you.
The condition is like this: The source file that I want to rsync to
another computer is 129M before I start the rsync. Durin
> Once synchronize a file. Does rscync first create a temporary in the
> remote machine first and then rename it? Or it direct write the difference
> into the dest-file?
>
> Could you please tell me what will happen to the dest-file when a rsync
> process interrupted by some problems(network prob
That is it. The destination file is unaffected until rsync completes its
replacement, then the directory entry is repointed at the new file and the
reference to the old inode freed.
Tim Conway
Unix System Administration
Contractor - IBM Global Services
desk:3032734776
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi:
Hi:
I really want to know how rsync works.
Once it synchronize a file. Does rscync first create a temporary in the
remote machine first and then rename it? Or it direct write the difference
into the dest-file?
Could you please tell me what will happen to the dest-file when a rsync
process interru
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 08:21:34PM -0500, Chao,Eisen R. wrote:
> Hi All:
>
>
> I thought the default behaviour for Rsync was that it would only
> overwrite
> destination files that have a lesser date than the source file. Instead
No. Rsync _replaces_ the destination file. And if --times
is ena
Hi All:
I thought the default behaviour for Rsync was that it would only
overwrite
destination files that have a lesser date than the source file. Instead
I
have this:
Source
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[/csapps115/IBMHTTPD/content-external/cna/html/meet]: ls -al meet.html
cc: (bcc: Tim Conway/LMT/SC/PHILIPS)
Subject: Question about rsync
Classification:
Hello All,
I've been getting an error using rsync that I've been
trying to track
down the cause of, but haven't been able to solve yet. Whe
Hello,
I am working on a backup solution to use a linux
box running rsync to backup an NT share
using automount with smbfs. I execute rsync as
'rsync -azv 192.168.1.202::data' which
works, however everytime I run rsync there is a
random mix of files and directories it updates,
even if the
Hi,
I'm trying to start rsync as a daemon however is always fail, any clue?
Here is my /etc/rsync.conf:
[test]
path = /tmp/
comment = Testing
Here is the strace of the execution:
strace rsync --daemon -v
execve("/usr/bin/rsync", ["rsync", "--daemon", "-v"], [/* 56 vars */]) =
0
brk(0)
45 matches
Mail list logo
