Hi,
Thanks for that!
On 12 August 2012 18:41, Wayne Davison wrote:
> I have imagined making the code pretend that the partial file and any
> destination file are concatenated together for the purpose of generating
> checksums. That would allow content references to both files, but rsync
> woul
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Wayne Davison wrote:
> I have imagined making the code pretend that the partial file and any
> destination file are concatenated together for the purpose of generating
> checksums.
>
Actually, that could be bad if the destination and partial file are both
huge.
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 9:03 AM, T.J. Crowder wrote:
> 1. Am I correct in inferring that when rsync sees data for a file in the
> --partial-dir directory, it applies its delta transfer algorithm to the
> partial file?
>
2. And that this is _instead of_ applying it to the real target file? (Not
> a
Apologies to the list, the title of this thread is completely wrong. It
should be something like "Question about --partial-dir and aborted
transfers of large files". Let's see if this mailing list program will
allow me to change it...
-- T.J.
On 10 August 2012 15:28, T.J. Crowde
