Re: Patch: update popt/ to 1.5.1

2002-04-22 Thread Jos Backus
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 09:30:50AM -0701, Jos Backus wrote: > > Has someone from FreeBSD has already pushed the patch to the RedHat > > chaps? > > Not that I am aware of but I will; I'll also keep the FreeBSD port maintainer > in the loop. I have notified the popt maintainer of some problems I a

Re: Patch: update popt/ to 1.5.1

2002-04-22 Thread Jos Backus
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 11:02:23PM +1000, Martin Pool wrote: > That looks fine. I do agree it's a bit hard to understand what you're > saying in the README. Yes. I'll improve on it before committing. > Has someone from FreeBSD has already pushed the patch to the RedHat > chaps? Not that I am a

Re: Patch: update popt/ to 1.5.1

2002-04-22 Thread Martin Pool
On 20 Apr 2002, Jos Backus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This patch updates the files under popt/ to the latest vendor drop. The only > change is the inclusion of a FreeBSD-specific patch to popt.c. This is needed > in case somebody decides to build rsync on that platform without using the > port.

Re: Patch: update popt/ to 1.5.1

2002-04-21 Thread Donovan Baarda
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 12:23:16PM -0700, Jos Backus wrote: > This patch updates the files under popt/ to the latest vendor drop. The only > change is the inclusion of a FreeBSD-specific patch to popt.c. This is needed > in case somebody decides to build rsync on that platform without using the >

Patch: update popt/ to 1.5.1

2002-04-20 Thread Jos Backus
This patch updates the files under popt/ to the latest vendor drop. The only change is the inclusion of a FreeBSD-specific patch to popt.c. This is needed in case somebody decides to build rsync on that platform without using the port. I'm not happy about the wording in popt/README.rsync so I may