; To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: PATCH/RFC: Another stab at the Cygwin hang problem
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 06:47:35AM -0400, Tillman, James wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: jw schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: jw schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 11:25 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: PATCH/RFC: Another stab at the Cygwin hang problem
>
>
[...]
> > Anyhow, just to let you know. If you're h
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 11:42:52PM +0900, Anthony Heading wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 03:52:59AM -0700, jw schultz wrote:
> > There is a huge window between the write() and the return of
> > waitpid() that depending on scheduling and signal delivery
> > allows the child pid to be reaped by SIG
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 03:52:59AM -0700, jw schultz wrote:
> There is a huge window between the write() and the return of
> waitpid() that depending on scheduling and signal delivery
> allows the child pid to be reaped by SIGCHILD handler. That
> results in this waitpid() returning -1 with errno
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
jw schultz wrote:
>I've attached an altered patch. I've only dealt with this
>one location which produced errors doing a ssh pull.
>
OK, I created a test package with your patch included, so that anyone
willing to test but not wililng to compile can u
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 06:47:35AM -0400, Tillman, James wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: jw schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 5:59 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: PATCH/RFC: Ano
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 06:47:35AM -0400, Tillman, James wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: jw schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 5:59 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: PATCH/RFC: Ano
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 06:47:35AM -0400, Tillman, James wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: jw schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 5:59 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: PATCH/RFC: Ano
ednesday, July 09, 2003 6:48 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: PATCH/RFC: Another stab at the Cygwin hang problem
>
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: jw schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 5:59 AM
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: jw schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 5:59 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: PATCH/RFC: Another stab at the Cygwin hang problem
>
>
> > I can't quite place why but my instincts inform m
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 05:49:45PM -0700, jw schultz wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 11:12:29PM +0900, Anthony Heading wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 04:54:22AM -0700, jw schultz wrote:
> > > Could you regenerate the patch with diff -u please?
> >
> > Okay, sure. This one against current CVS
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 11:12:29PM +0900, Anthony Heading wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 04:54:22AM -0700, jw schultz wrote:
> > Could you regenerate the patch with diff -u please?
>
> Okay, sure. This one against current CVS.
Thanks that helps in examining it.
I can't quite place why but my
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 04:54:22AM -0700, jw schultz wrote:
> Could you regenerate the patch with diff -u please?
Okay, sure. This one against current CVS.
Anthony
--- cleanup.c.Orig 2003-06-30 22:42:16.0 +0900
+++ cleanup.c 2003-06-30 22:42:47.0 +0900
@@ -96,7 +96,6 @@
Apparently this fixed the problem for Tillman, James.
Could you regenerate the patch with diff -u please?
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 04:16:12PM +0900, Anthony Heading wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-09/msg01155.html, I noted that
> the often-observed hangs of rsync unde
Hi,
In http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-09/msg01155.html, I noted that
the often-observed hangs of rsync under Cygwin were assuaged by a call to
msleep().
After upgrading my Cygwin environment to rsync 2.5.6, I'm seeing these
hangs again, not surprisingly given a CVS entry for main.c note
15 matches
Mail list logo
