Re: Oops more testing was required....

2003-06-28 Thread jw schultz
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 10:55:13PM -0700, Ben Escoto wrote: > > "jws" == jw schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote the following on Fri, 27 Jun 2003 19:49:22 -0700 > > jws> Long term, i think the bwlimit stuff needs a complete > jws> reexamination. In addition to the sleeping times and

Re: Oops more testing was required....

2003-06-27 Thread Ben Escoto
> "jws" == jw schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote the following on Fri, 27 Jun 2003 19:49:22 -0700 jws> Long term, i think the bwlimit stuff needs a complete jws> reexamination. In addition to the sleeping times and spreading jws> the load as in the "smoother bandwidth limiting" but

Re: Oops more testing was required....

2003-06-27 Thread jw schultz
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 01:28:32PM +0200, Rogier Wolff wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 09:09:59PM +1000, Martin Pool wrote: > > On 17 Jun 2003, Rogier Wolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Oops. Missed one line in the last patch > > > > Thankyou. That looks good. > > > > If we're go

Re: Oops more testing was required....

2003-06-18 Thread jw schultz
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 01:52:10PM +0200, Rogier Wolff wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 04:26:48AM -0700, jw schultz wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 09:09:59PM +1000, Martin Pool wrote: > > > On 17 Jun 2003, Rogier Wolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Oops. Missed one line in the la

Re: Oops more testing was required....

2003-06-18 Thread jw schultz
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 01:28:32PM +0200, Rogier Wolff wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 09:09:59PM +1000, Martin Pool wrote: > > On 17 Jun 2003, Rogier Wolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Oops. Missed one line in the last patch > > > > Thankyou. That looks good. > > > > If we're go

Re: Oops more testing was required....

2003-06-18 Thread Rogier Wolff
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 04:26:48AM -0700, jw schultz wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 09:09:59PM +1000, Martin Pool wrote: > > On 17 Jun 2003, Rogier Wolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Oops. Missed one line in the last patch > > > > Thankyou. That looks good. > > > > If we're goin

Re: Oops more testing was required....

2003-06-18 Thread Martin Pool
On 18 Jun 2003, jw schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 09:09:59PM +1000, Martin Pool wrote: > > On 17 Jun 2003, Rogier Wolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Oops. Missed one line in the last patch > > > > Thankyou. That looks good. > > > > If we're going to m

Re: Oops more testing was required....

2003-06-18 Thread jw schultz
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 09:09:59PM +1000, Martin Pool wrote: > On 17 Jun 2003, Rogier Wolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Oops. Missed one line in the last patch > > Thankyou. That looks good. > > If we're going to make this more accurate it might be worthwhile to > actually look at ho

Re: Oops more testing was required....

2003-06-18 Thread Rogier Wolff
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 09:09:59PM +1000, Martin Pool wrote: > On 17 Jun 2003, Rogier Wolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Oops. Missed one line in the last patch > > Thankyou. That looks good. > > If we're going to make this more accurate it might be worthwhile to > actually look at ho

Re: Oops more testing was required....

2003-06-18 Thread Martin Pool
On 17 Jun 2003, Rogier Wolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Oops. Missed one line in the last patch Thankyou. That looks good. If we're going to make this more accurate it might be worthwhile to actually look at how long we really did sleep for, and use that to adjust time_to_sleep rather t

Oops more testing was required....

2003-06-17 Thread Rogier Wolff
Oops. Missed one line in the last patch Roger. -- ** [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2600998 ** *-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --* * The Worlds Ecosystem is a stable system. Stable systems may experience * * ex