Phil Vandry wrote:
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 07:49:06 -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
Sorry for the slow reply -- I marked your message for more in-depth
study, and failed to get back to it until now.
That's OK, I've done worse :-(
drawbacks:
- It creates a single (potentially really big)
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 07:49:06 -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> Sorry for the slow reply -- I marked your message for more in-depth
> study, and failed to get back to it until now.
That's OK, I've done worse :-(
> drawbacks:
>
> - It creates a single (potentially really big) directory of files on
>
Sorry for the slow reply -- I marked your message for more in-depth
study, and failed to get back to it until now.
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 08:01:16PM -0400, Phil Vandry wrote:
> I have long wished for a feature in rsync to detect files that have
> renamed on the sender side since the last time a s
Hello rsyncers,
I have long wished for a feature in rsync to detect files that have
renamed on the sender side since the last time a sync was performed,
and avoid transfering those files to the destination the same way it
avoids transfering files that haven't changed.
Example 1: a log directory (
