> >> > The Stats shows a literal data of 0, so it would appear that it
> >> > recognizes the data is in sync, but why does it show the
> >> filenames? I
> >> > thought it should only show the names of the files that
> >> have changed?
> >>
> >> For enlightenment, see the description of the -t (--t
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Max Kipness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[... missing attribution here for next level of quoting ...]
>> On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 09:57:39PM -0500, Max Kipness wrote:
>> > The Stats shows a literal data of 0, so it would appear that it
>> > recognizes the data is in sync, but why d
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 09:57:39PM -0500, Max Kipness wrote:
> > The Stats shows a literal data of 0, so it would appear that it
> > recognizes the data is in sync, but why does it show the
> filenames? I
> > thought it should only show the names of the files that
> have changed?
>
> For enl
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 09:57:39PM -0500, Max Kipness wrote:
> The Stats shows a literal data of 0, so it would appear that it
> recognizes the data is in sync, but why does it show the filenames? I
> thought it should only show the names of the files that have changed?
For enlightenment, see the
I've got a strange issue that I'm hoping someone can help out with.
Just installed 2.5.6 on a Redhat 8 system.
Was doing a simple test from one local directory to another (in the
root) with a couple of text files in the source.
Using the following command line: rsync /directory1/ /directory2/ -v
