On 10/1/07, Matt McCutchen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If the remote filesystem supports efficient copying of a range of data
> from one offset to another, then #2 is moot and a smart client can do
> both pushes and pulls efficiently using your scheme and zsync's
> "reverse" delta-transfer algorit
nst the file
> to be copied. If it matches, it skips it. If it doesn't match, it just
> transfers just the difference. It then replaces the checksum of that
> transferred file to the cache. That way one could have a remote data store
> and not have to run rsync on the remote system.
h, it just
transfers just the difference. It then replaces the checksum of that
transferred file to the cache. That way one could have a remote data store
and not have to run rsync on the remote system. IE, you could have a mapped
drive or FTP folder or S3 storage area that would all be
On 9/30/07, Stephen Zemlicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem is some files don't change in size. So I was hoping that the
> checksums could be cached. Perhaps I'm mistaken but I thought the checksum
> determined what actual blocks were transferred. I suppose it could be
> cached at eith
; I suppose it could be cached at either storage location.
if you use rsync on a mapped drive, you have no "local" and "remote" storage
location from an rsync`s point of view, because rsync isn`t being executed on
the remote node. so if rsync calculates a checksum it`s always
__
Stephen Zemlicka
Integrated Computer Technologies
PH. 608-558-5926
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
McCutchen
Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2007 5:03 PM
To: Stephen Zemlicka
Cc: rsync@lists.samba.org
Subject:
On 9/28/07, Stephen Zemlicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a way to have rsync cache the checksums for something like this and
> would that help?
I'm not sure exactly what you mean. You said you were using the -c
(--checksum) option, which makes rsync decide whether to update each
destina
On 9/28/07, Stephen Zemlicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would this still help for online
> storage though as most have much greater download bandwidth than upload. So
> it would basically download the file with your faster download speeds,
> compare, then upload the changes with your slower uplo
Behalf Of Matt
McCutchen
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 6:51 PM
To: Stephen Zemlicka
Cc: rsync@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Mapped Drive
On 9/24/07, Stephen Zemlicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think I got it (with the help of a friend). You can, in fact, rsync to
a
>
rsync@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Mapped Drive
On 9/24/07, Stephen Zemlicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think I got it (with the help of a friend). You can, in fact, rsync to
a
> mapped drive efficiently. You must include --no-whole-file. My 100MB
file
> only transferred a few MB usin
On 9/24/07, Stephen Zemlicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think I got it (with the help of a friend). You can, in fact, rsync to a
> mapped drive efficiently. You must include --no-whole-file. My 100MB file
> only transferred a few MB using that method and it opened up with the
I think I got it (with the help of a friend). You can, in fact, rsync to a
mapped drive efficiently. You must include --no-whole-file. My 100MB file
only transferred a few MB using that method and it opened up with the
changes just fine. Now it works just like I want. It's not the qui
t: Re: Mapped Drive
On 9/24/07, Stephen Zemlicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The reason I was trying this was because all I can do is map a drive. As
of
> yet, I cannot modify the server like that.
If the only access you have to the remote directory is to read or
write it via a mapped
On 9/24/07, Stephen Zemlicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The reason I was trying this was because all I can do is map a drive. As of
> yet, I cannot modify the server like that.
If the only access you have to the remote directory is to read or
write it via a mapped drive, you can&
2007 12:24 PM
To: Stephen Zemlicka
Cc: rsync@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Mapped Drive
On 9/24/07, Stephen Zemlicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What exactly is involved in the remote shell? Can this be done on a
windows
> to windows backup? Do you have a link handy otherwise goo
with the mapped drive, install
an ssh client on the machine running rsync, and direct rsync to the
mapped drive using a path of the form
host:/cygdrive/C/path/to/mapped/drive/ (note the *single* colon).
cwRsync ( http://itefix.no/cwrsync/ ) is a nice packaging containing
rsync, an ssh client and server
]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
McCutchen
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 12:09 PM
To: Stephen Zemlicka
Cc: rsync@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Mapped Drive
On 9/24/07, Stephen Zemlicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am havin
On Mon 24 Sep 2007, Stephen Zemlicka wrote:
> I am having trouble running rsync over a mapped drive. Basically it only
> copies whole files. I use the -rvcS switches. Any suggestions?
>From the manpage:
-W, --whole-file
With this option the incremental rsync algorit
On 9/24/07, Stephen Zemlicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am having trouble running rsync over a mapped drive. Basically it only
> copies whole files. I use the –rvcS switches. Any suggestions?
The delta-transfer algorithm reduces only the communication between
the sending a
I am having trouble running rsync over a mapped drive. Basically it only
copies whole files. I use the -rvcS switches. Any suggestions?
TIA
_
Stephen Zemlicka
Integrated Computer Technologies
PH. 608-558-5926
E-Mail <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 05:57:37PM +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Will the upgrade to latest rsync will help? We are using rsync 2.6.3.
It shouldn't make any difference because the "permission denied" error
is coming from your OS, and that's outside the control of rsync.
..wayne..
--
To unsu
mapped drive in Windows. We've provided the full
access to I: for everybody.
Will the upgrade to latest rsync will help? We are using rsync
2.6.3.
Thanks in advance,
sanal
-Original Message-
From: Wayne Davison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 5:
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 09:11:52PM +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> @ERROR: chdir failed
Just read the server's log file to discover what directory was being
attempted in that chdir() call (rsync doesn't like to reveal such info
from the daemon to the client). I'm guessing you're trying to u
Title: Message
Hello
all,
When we tried the rsync of files from a network mapped
drive (Windows) to Linux host, we are getting the following error.
rsync -av @::
where is the rsync
module name defined in rsyncd.conf file for mapped drive.
Error :-
@ERROR
24 matches
Mail list logo
