Hi,
On 2006-03-01 18:29, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=29760&max_rows=25&style=flat&viewmonth=200404&viewday=5
>
> If I understand correctly, provided we add random seeds for blocksums,
> these weaknesses would only make attack case 4) easier.
It i
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 14:58 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A year ago we discussed the strength of the MD4 hash used by rsync and
> librsync, and one of the points mentioned was that only collision
> attacks are known on MD4. Well, a recent paper by Wang et al [1] shows a
> several seco
On 2006-02-21 16:09, Martin Pool wrote:
> Could you please forward this into the bug tracker so it's not lost?
Done:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1436299&group_id=56125&atid=479439
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1436301&group_id=56125&atid=4
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 14:58 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> A year ago we discussed the strength of the MD4 hash used by rsync and
> librsync, and one of the points mentioned was that only collision
> attacks are known on MD4.
Could you please forward this into the bug tracker so it's not lost?
