https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1889
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1889
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-12 15:05 ---
Note that in the new version, this too-long receiver-side scan can be avoided by
using --delete-during (--del). However, I'm still considering adding a "keep
alive" mes
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1889
Summary: Keep Alive packets
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.3
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: core
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 06:55:19AM +0200, Pieter De Wit wrote:
> Would it be posiable to add a "keep alive" option to rsync.
This would be a good suggestion to add to the bug database:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=rsync
If you don't want to sign-up for bugzilla to do that, I'
On Thu, 07 Oct 2004, Pieter De Wit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> Would it be posiable to add a "keep alive" option to rsync. The problem
> I am having is that the connection is dropped while rsync is scanning
> the local directory. If "null" packets are send to the server every
Hello Everyone,
Would it be posiable to add a "keep alive" option to rsync. The problem
I am having is that the connection is dropped while rsync is scanning
the local directory. If "null" packets are send to the server every 60
seconds or so, the connection will stay up and the sync will work.
