Harald Fielker wrote:
> Am Samstag, 18. Januar 2003 22:54 schrieb Max Bowsher:
>> Green, Paul wrote:
>>> You might consider using zlib instead of gzip; same algorithm, same
>>> author, but you can access the compression code via a subroutine
>
> Do you have an idea how i can use it for compressing
Am Samstag, 18. Januar 2003 22:54 schrieb Max Bowsher:
Hi,
> Green, Paul wrote:
> > Harald,
> >
> > You might consider using zlib instead of gzip; same algorithm, same
> > author, but you can access the compression code via a subroutine
Do you have an idea how i can use it for compressing a whol
Green, Paul wrote:
> Harald,
>
> You might consider using zlib instead of gzip; same algorithm, same
> author, but you can access the compression code via a subroutine
> interface. You would not have to spawn another process to run gzip,
> and you would not be dependent upon the user having gzip in
Harald,
You might consider using zlib instead of gzip; same algorithm, same author,
but you can access the compression code via a subroutine interface. You
would not have to spawn another process to run gzip, and you would not be
dependent upon the user having gzip installed.
It is not covered by
Hi,
i finished my storage compression patch for rsync.
WARNING - THIS IS ONLY FOR TESTING!
How does this work?
Just add a "-Z" option to your common rsync commandline parameters. The
destination files will be stored in a compressed way (by using a hardwired
call of gzip).
This works in both
