Adam Nielsen wrote...
> I'm wondering whether it is feasible to have an option that will make
> rsync spawn a separate thread to close files it has created, to avoid
> the main process blocking while the destination files are flushed during
> the close operation?
While your scenario resembles a p
Can you let rsync do the networking? If rsync isn't doing the
networking then it isn't much more capable than cp yet it is
significantly slower than cp.
On 12/18/2016 09:13 AM, Adam Nielsen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm wondering whether it is feasible to have an option that will make
> rsync spawn a
Hi all,
I'm wondering whether it is feasible to have an option that will make
rsync spawn a separate thread to close files it has created, to avoid
the main process blocking while the destination files are flushed during
the close operation?
The reason I ask is that it is currently very slow to u
