On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 09:13 -0500, Charles Perreault wrote:
> For what I read about that lax patch, using it is risky. In fact
> that's not what I want at all, I want the content to be checked using
> block checksums and the delta-transfer algorithm if the detection did
> a mistake, like the detec
On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 22:10 -0500, Charles Perreault wrote:
> now input the following to test moving into a new folder :
>
> $ mkdir src/dir1
> $ mv src/file2 src/dir1/
> $ rsync --detect-renamed -avz --delete src/ dest/
> building file list ... done
> deleting file2
> ./
> dir1/
> dir1/file2
>
>
On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 21:25 -0400, Charles Perreault wrote:
> I heard recently about the detect-renamed patch for rsync. I was about
> to code something similar, I need it badly, but decided to give the
> patch a try first. It seems to work well but it's rename detection
> scheme seems to be l
Hello,
I heard recently about the detect-renamed patch for rsync. I was about
to code something similar, I need it badly, but decided to give the
patch a try first. It seems to work well but it's rename detection
scheme seems to be limited. From my tests, it seems to detect that a
file has
