On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 12:38:11PM -0500, Alberto Accomazzi wrote:
| I just noticed that there is an extra blank line in the output generated
| by rsync when the --dry-run (-n) flag is used. This seems to have
| started with 2.6.0. Is this desired? The reason why I'm asking is
| because I us
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 12:38:11PM -0500, Alberto Accomazzi wrote:
> I just noticed that there is an extra blank line in the output generated
> by rsync when the --dry-run (-n) flag is used. This seems to have
> started with 2.6.0. Is this desired?
The NEWS file has this (understated statement
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 12:38:11PM -0500, Alberto Accomazzi wrote:
> I just noticed that there is an extra blank line in the output generated
> by rsync when the --dry-run (-n) flag is used. This seems to have
> started with 2.6.0. Is this desired? The reason why I'm asking is
> because I use
I just noticed that there is an extra blank line in the output generated
by rsync when the --dry-run (-n) flag is used. This seems to have
started with 2.6.0. Is this desired? The reason why I'm asking is
because I use scripts that parse the output from rsync and little
modifications in verb