Re: Behavior of --checksum, suggestion

2005-06-07 Thread Wayne Davison
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 05:44:25PM -0400, Moshe Jacobson wrote: > I just did a test and found that --partial will prevent rsync from > transferring the entire file again when the mtimes vary but the sizes > are the same. No, --partial tells rsync to keep a partially transferred file. Rsync will a

Re: Behavior of --checksum, suggestion

2005-06-07 Thread Moshe Jacobson
Thanks for the prompt reply, Wayne. I just did a test and found that --partial will prevent rsync from transferring the entire file again when the mtimes vary but the sizes are the same. I suppose this is sufficient, but how does it determine that the files are the same if it's not doing a check

Re: Behavior of --checksum, suggestion

2005-06-07 Thread Wayne Davison
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 04:46:43PM -0400, Moshe Jacobson wrote: > Is this something that would be hard to implement? Yes, it would be rather awkward in the current protocol. The way things currently work, the receiving side needs to have all relevant info already available in order to decide what

Behavior of --checksum, suggestion

2005-06-07 Thread Moshe Jacobson
Hi rsync folks, I understand that by default, rsync will re-copy a file if the timestamp differs, but the size is the same. Sometimes, though, I have large files whose mtime have been changed but are otherwise identical. It seems a solution to this is --checksum, but it seems like --checksum co