On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 23:10 -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> In light of this, I admit (red-faced) that the directory of patches
> actually seems to be better than anything git supports natively. I
> wonder if the git people have a recommended solution for projects like
> rsync that have a trunk and
Wayne,
Thanks for addressing the concerns. I have some comments:
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 15:33 -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> The main purpose for the generated files being in CVS and/or git
> (including the magic "configure" script) is to make the build farm work.
> When a human checks out the fil
On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 03:48:10PM -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> 1. It looks like you retroactively removed all generated files from
> the history. This may inconvenience a user who seeks to an older
> version of the source code and lacks the magic "configure" to help
> regenerate the files.
The
Wayne,
I have a few more concerns about the git repository:
1. It looks like you retroactively removed all generated files from the
history. This may inconvenience a user who seeks to an older version of
the source code and lacks the magic "configure" to help regenerate the
files. You also remo
