On Thu, 9 May 2002, Dave Dykstra wrote:
> Maybe I'm dense, but I don't see how that's any different from turning
> on a flag (with the opposite meaning) at the end.
The reason this makes a difference is that not all the files get into
that code. Any files that are identical just get skipped over
On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 12:13:22PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Tue, 7 May 2002, Dave Dykstra wrote:
> > I am a little bit uncomfortable with the sense of the flag
> > FLAG_NO_DELETE, though, because I'm afraid there might become more
> > cases in the future where it should be set and we won't
In an effort to get my long-desired move-files functionality into rsync,
I have created a version of my patch that runs as an extra pass at the
end of the processing. This results in a simpler set of changes to
rsync.
I still think it would be nice to have incremental deletions during
large tran
