s - it
cannot handle hardlinks.
Ivan
-Original Message-
From: Michael Salmon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 8:38 AM
To: Kovalev, Ivan; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: 2-way rsync with delete
On Monday, June 25, 2001 03:17:18 PM -0400 "Koval
On Monday, June 25, 2001 03:17:18 PM -0400 "Kovalev, Ivan"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+--
| I am doing a "poor man cluster" using rsync to synchronize content of 2
| servers each of which has its own directly attached storage. Since it is a
| cluster (load balancer on top of these 2 servers),
is now with his home - office
setup.
Ivan
-Original Message-
From: Dave Dykstra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 4:21 PM
To: Britton
Cc: Kovalev, Ivan; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: 2-way rsync with delete
In general Britton is correct. The only thing
In general Britton is correct. The only thing that might help Ivan is the
-u option, which works strictly on file modification time. He didn't
mention having discovered it.
- Dave Dykstra
On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 12:01:00PM -0800, Britton wrote:
>
> I do this sort of thing between my home and
I do this sort of thing between my home and work machines, but only one
system changes at a time, and I do a sync in the appropriate direction at
the end of each session.
I think what you want may not be possible, since rsync doesn't maintain
any database about the files it handles and deleted f
I am doing a "poor man cluster" using rsync to synchronize content of 2
servers each of which has its own directly attached storage. Since it is a
cluster (load balancer on top of these 2 servers), new additions as well as
deletions might appear on any of the 2 servers.
Newly added files are rep
