Re: --whole-file option was accidentally changed to --whole

2002-01-16 Thread Dave Dykstra
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 12:40:30PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote: > Good catch. > > Tridge suggested the other day that it's bad to make -W the default > for local transfers, because it makes behaviour kind of less > reproducible: people who test rsync locally will see possibly > different bugs when r

Re: --whole-file option was accidentally changed to --whole

2002-01-15 Thread Martin Pool
Good catch. Tridge suggested the other day that it's bad to make -W the default for local transfers, because it makes behaviour kind of less reproducible: people who test rsync locally will see possibly different bugs when running it over the network. I'm inclined to agree, but I'm not sure. --

--whole-file option was accidentally changed to --whole

2002-01-15 Thread Dave Dykstra
Aack, I just noticed that the --whole-file option was accidentally changed to --whole when the option parsing mechanism was switched to popt before rsync 2.5.0. I just put a fix into the rsync CVS, but anybody who wants that option to work with all versions of rsync is going to have to use -W