On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 18:41 -0400, Matthew Monaco wrote:
> > Note (if you haven't already) that you can do the "cp" in the
> > --rsync-path rather than in a separate ssh session.
>
> Thanks for the tip, Matt, but this does not appear to be working for me.
>
> I've tried rsyncing to various places
In the event that --link-dest=DIR is the option taking on the new
behavior (and thus is affected by --delete), I think that the lines
given by --itemize-changes should not indicate the creation of "old"
directories. (or there should be yet another option to suppress these.)
In the meantime - is t
On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 17:26 -0400, Matthew Monaco wrote:
> In the event that --link-dest=DIR is the option taking on the new
> behavior (and thus is affected by --delete), I think that the lines
> given by --itemize-changes should not indicate the creation of "old"
> directories.
I agree.
> In th
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 01:14 -0400, Matthew Monaco wrote:
> I've been thinking about the current behavior of the --link-dest=DIR
> option. In the absence of --delete, ALL members of DIR should be linked
> to the destination (aside from those that are changed). If not, there
> should at least be a
Greetings All,
I've been thinking about the current behavior of the --link-dest=DIR
option. In the absence of --delete, ALL members of DIR should be linked
to the destination (aside from those that are changed). If not, there
should at least be a --no-link-dest-delete option. (This latter optio
