Re: --ignore-existing not as expected

On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 17:14 -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote: > On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 14:19 +0100, Lasse Kliemann wrote: > > Is this correct behavior? > > > > File `foo' gets overwritten with directory `foo', > > even though --ignore-existing is given. > > I had never thought about this case, but pro

Re: --ignore-existing not as expected

* Message by -Matt McCutchen- from Fri 2008-02-22: > On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 14:19 +0100, Lasse Kliemann wrote: > > Is this correct behavior? > > > > File `foo' gets overwritten with directory `foo', > > even though --ignore-existing is given. > > I had never thought about this case, but probably

Re: --ignore-existing not as expected

On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 14:19 +0100, Lasse Kliemann wrote: > Is this correct behavior? > > File `foo' gets overwritten with directory `foo', > even though --ignore-existing is given. I had never thought about this case, but probably --ignore-existing should stop rsync from replacing directories wi

--ignore-existing not as expected

Is this correct behavior? File `foo' gets overwritten with directory `foo', even though --ignore-existing is given. % rsync --version rsync version 3.0.0pre10 protocol version 30.PR17 Copyright (C) 1996-2007 by Andrew Tridgell, Wayne Davison, and others. Web site: http://rsync.samba.org/ Capa