Re: [patch] NFSv4/ZFS ACLs

2012-07-22 Thread Wayne Davison
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 1:42 PM, wrote: > it has no way to specify remote-side-only extra args to rsync. > If you can rebuild the rsync, you could add the remote-option.diff patch (adding an option that will come standard in 3.1.0). That lets you specify --remote-option=--fake-super. Or perhap

[patch] NFSv4/ZFS ACLs

2012-07-21 Thread f-rsync
If you're thinking about changing the way attrs work, here's a question for you. I just recently started trying to use them for the first time, in backing up a Windows host via a wrapper script that runs the remote rsync under Cygwin on the Windows side, by mounting the source disk as a VSS snapsh

Re: [patch] NFSv4/ZFS ACLs

2012-07-21 Thread Wayne Davison
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Richard P wrote: > This is a PoC patch for NFSv4/ZFS ACLs. > Much appreciated. Your patch looks like it has some nice ideas that I'd like to get integrated into rsync. Sorry for the huge delay in getting back to you. Linux and Solaris represent NFSv4 ACLs diffe

Re: [patch] NFSv4/ZFS ACLs

2012-06-09 Thread Richard P
> > This time with a non-stripped attachment (hopefully) > diff -uNr rsync-3.0.9.orig/acls.c rsync-3.0.9/acls.c --- rsync-3.0.9.orig/acls.c 2011-05-31 00:39:07.0 +0900 +++ rsync-3.0.9/acls.c 2012-06-05 11:05:42.0 +0900 @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ extern int inc_recurse; extern int pres

[patch] NFSv4/ZFS ACLs

2012-06-09 Thread Richard P
This is a PoC patch for NFSv4/ZFS ACLs. The objective of the patch is that rsync --acls support NFSv4/ZFS ACLs without requiring a new command line option NFSv4 ACLs can't be represented using POSIX draft ACLs, if an NFSv4 ACL is present a separate POSIX draft ACL will not be present and there ar