On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 22:17 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On 10/15/07, Aaron Digulla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is for a production system which goes online Q1 2008. Should I use
> > the latest stable version of rsync (2.6.9) or will there be a release of
> > 3.0 until then?
>
> Rsync 3.
On 10/15/07, Aaron Digulla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks. I'll try to convince my bosses to see this as "payment" for
> using rsync :-) I just hope I can find a simple way to build rsync on
> Windows ... I guess I'll try with Cygwin since I already have that
> installed and I could build Ghos
Matt McCutchen schrieb:
> In the same way, I encourage you to test and
> begin using the source-backup patch now if it suits your needs; if you
> want the patch added to the main version, you can help make that more
> likely by improving it.
Thanks. I'll try to convince my bosses to see this as "
On 10/15/07, Aaron Digulla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the input. If this wasn't for a production system, I'd do
> that :-) Why don't you apply the patch the release version?
Because the patch is a quick hack to serve a niche need, so the
benefit of saving people who need source backup
- Weitergeleitete Nachricht von [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Datum: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:05:13 +0200
Von: Aaron Digulla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Antwort an: Aaron Digulla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Betreff: Re: [feature request] Modify --backup option to make
backups on sour
On 10/15/07, Aaron Digulla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you please modify the backup options to work together with
> --remove-source-files so I'm able to create a reliable "move between
> hosts" script?
The patch "patches/source-backup.diff" in the source tree adds an
option --source-backup to
Hello,
Can you please modify the backup options to work together with
--remove-source-files so I'm able to create a reliable "move between
hosts" script?
If --backup is specified, the files to be deleted should be renamed on
the source side. If --backup-dir is specified, they should be mo
