Re: [RFC] protocol version deadwood removal

2003-03-26 Thread jw schultz
Attached patch illustrates* the dead code removal. Code providing backwards compatability with protocol versions prior to 15 is excised. * for the sake of readability patch is made with diff -ub so indentation changes are not observed. Actual changes will fix indentation on no-longer condit

Re: [RFC] protocol version

2003-03-22 Thread Max Bowsher
jw schultz wrote: > I'm in the midst of coding a patch set for consideration > that will bump the protocol version and have a couple of > observations. > > The current minimum backwards-compatible protocol is 15 > but we have code that checks for protocol versions as old as > 12. If someone else d

[RFC] protocol version

2003-03-22 Thread jw schultz
I'm in the midst of coding a patch set for consideration that will bump the protocol version and have a couple of observations. The current minimum backwards-compatible protocol is 15 but we have code that checks for protocol versions as old as 12. If someone else doesn't beat me to it i'm consid