On 10/5/07, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For the next "feature release" of rsync after 3.0.0, I'm imagining
> adding support for a database API that would allow extra information
> about files to be maintained and used (completely optional, of course).
Does this mean you plan to cont
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 01:57:22PM -0600, Frank Thomas wrote:
> This action is the simplest method of performing an rsync, but it
> would be nice to have rsync to be intelligent enough to recognize a
> name change but not an inode change on the source.
For the next "feature release" of rsync after
On 10/4/07, Frank Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This action is the simplest method of performing an rsync, but it would be
> nice to have rsync to be intelligent enough to recognize a name change but
> not an inode change on the source.
The --detect-renamed option provided by the patch
"patc
