https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9783
--- Comment #5 from m8r-28l5...@mailinator.com 2013-12-02 23:01:59 UTC ---
I can only chime in on this bug.
I'm using rsync on my ReasyNAS 102, which as an ARM core (Marvell Armada 370).
Unfortunately, rsync is _very_ slow locally. The constant check
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9783
--- Comment #4 from Kilian CAVALOTTI
2013-05-13 12:46:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > what result does remote scp vs local-copy-on-sshfs give (i.e what is the
> > impact
> > of sshfs) ?
>
> They are the comparab
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9783
--- Comment #3 from Kilian CAVALOTTI
2013-05-03 20:12:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> what result does remote scp vs local-copy-on-sshfs give (i.e what is the
> impact
> of sshfs) ?
They are the comparable, the impact of sshfs is minimal. I
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9783
--- Comment #2 from roland 2013-05-03 18:31:50 UTC ---
what result does remote scp vs local-copy-on-sshfs give (i.e what is the impact
of sshfs) ?
if that gives similar performance, your comparison is proably somewhat valid -
otherwise you comparing
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9783
--- Comment #1 from Kilian CAVALOTTI
2013-05-02 14:48:00 UTC ---
One way to easily reproduce this problem is to try to transfer a single large
file using rsync:
a. over ssh:
rsync -av host0:/path/to/file /tmp/file
b. locally, by mounting the r
