https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7865
--- Comment #7 from Wayne Davison 2013-12-25 18:18:40 UTC ---
While you didn't output errno after the failing acl() call, it appears that it
returns 22 (EINVAL), which means that your OS doesn't like the args to that
call. I googled a bit and saw s
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7865
--- Comment #6 from glorang 2013-12-18 14:45:01 UTC ---
We're facing the same issue. Ran a gdb against latest rsync 3.1.0. Hopefully
this helps, I'm not a C guru though.
# getacl Save
# file: Save
# owner: 200
# group: 200
user::rwx
user:201:rwx
us
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7865
--- Comment #5 from Wayne Davison 2011-06-20 15:00:17 UTC ---
get_acl() is not a systemcall.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for t
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7865
--- Comment #4 from Reinhard Lubos 2011-06-20
13:04:15 UTC ---
errno is 22 as you & we can see in different logfiles:
rsync-patdb.log:2010/12/08 09:40:06 [21974] rsync: get_acl:
sys_acl_get_file(rsynctest/abc/123, ACL_TYPE_ACCESS): Invalid argument
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7865
--- Comment #3 from Reinhard Lubos 2011-06-20
09:45:26 UTC ---
errno is 22 as you & we can see in different logfiles:
rsync-patdb.log:2010/12/08 09:40:06 [21974] rsync: get_acl:
sys_acl_get_file(rsynctest/abc/123, ACL_TYPE_ACCESS): Invalid argument
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7865
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from Wayne Davison
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7865
--- Comment #1 from reinhard.lu...@comlineag.de 2010-12-14 05:56 CST
---
result with standard rsync: files or dirs with more than 16 ACLs in source get
no ACLs in destination
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userpref
