https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6746
--- Comment #8 from Matt McCutchen 2011-04-01 21:01:56
UTC ---
Created attachment 6364
--> https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=6364
Test script
(In reply to comment #7)
> Alphabetical order matters. If A has already been copied and B i
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6746
--- Comment #7 from ED Fochler 2011-04-01 18:54:05 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #6)
I apologize for talking to myself on-list, but I've become enlightened about my
problem.
Alphabetical order matters. If A has already been copied and B is a new
h
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6746
ED Fochler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sa...@liquidbinary.com
--- Comment #6 from ED
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6746
--- Comment #5 from ED Fochler 2011-04-01 17:28:19 UTC
---
--protocol=29 solves this behavior for me. It seems the short circuit behavior
of rsync v3 doesn't check/remember inodes of files in the transfer request but
not currently being transferre
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6746
--- Comment #4 from uto...@email.unc.edu 2011-02-14 09:54 CST ---
Perhaps related: I'm using rsync 3.0.7 between two Fedora 13 boxes. Every day I
backup a tree of just under 1 files and directories. I keep 30 days worth
of backups in
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6746
theo.b...@greenpeak.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||theo.b...@greenpeak.com
--
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6746
--- Comment #2 from dieter.ferdin...@gmx.de 2010-03-11 09:55 CST ---
hello,
this is an other problem like my problem.
on my system, rsync should delete an existing file and link it to an identical
file.
but this don't work, so i delete
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6746
--- Comment #1 from theo.b...@greenpeak.com 2010-03-11 03:14 CST ---
I have a similar problem. The content of some directories will not get hard
linked but copied instead. The command I use is:
rsync -a \
--link-dest first_dir \
