[Bug 3653] Reduce the need for the "vanished files" warning

2016-03-20 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3653 --- Comment #27 from samba --- Still an issue on rsync-3.1.1-3 as found on Debian 8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsub

[Bug 3653] Reduce the need for the "vanished files" warning

2014-01-01 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3653 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 3653] Reduce the need for the "vanished files" warning

2014-01-01 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3653 --- Comment #25 from jakob...@gmail.com 2014-01-01 15:04:58 UTC --- What remains to be done is to make the the rsync-no-vanished script accessible to users. I created bug 10356 about including it in the tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzil

[Bug 3653] Reduce the need for the "vanished files" warning

2012-11-01 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3653 Nick Hibma changed: What|Removed |Added CC||n...@anywi.com --- Comment #24 from Nick Hibma

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3653] Reduce the need for the "vanished files" warning

2011-02-11 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3653 --- Comment #23 from g...@delfi.ee 2011-02-11 09:41 CST --- i updated patch again as found similar pattern in code http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/packages/rsync/ignore-vanished.patch?rev=1.2 but seems the problem is report

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3653] Reduce the need for the "vanished files" warning

2011-01-25 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3653 --- Comment #22 from g...@delfi.ee 2011-01-25 13:55 CST --- Created an attachment (id=6228) --> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=6228&action=view) updated patch in #c1 against rsync-3.0.7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3653] Reduce the need for the "vanished files" warning

2010-11-21 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3653 --- Comment #21 from m...@mattmccutchen.net 2010-11-21 21:12 CST --- (In reply to comment #20) > AFAICS, delete_in_dir() suppresses deletion when /any/ flag is set in > io_error: > > if (io_error && !ignore_errors) { Indeed, t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3653] Reduce the need for the "vanished files" warning

2010-11-21 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3653 --- Comment #20 from jr-sambabugzi...@quo.to 2010-11-21 19:43 CST --- (In reply to comment #19) > You're right that the IOERR_GENERAL flag (which corresponds to that message) > stops all destination files from being deleted. But it is o

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3653] Reduce the need for the "vanished files" warning

2010-11-21 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3653 --- Comment #19 from m...@mattmccutchen.net 2010-11-21 17:57 CST --- (In reply to comment #18) > What's also annoying is that a "vanished file" warning triggers: > > "IO error encountered -- skipping file deletion" > > which if I'm not

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3653] Reduce the need for the "vanished files" warning

2010-11-20 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3653 jr-sambabugzi...@quo.to changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jr-sambabugzi...@quo.to --

Re: [Bug 3653] Reduce the need for the "vanished files" warning

2010-10-03 Thread Henri Shustak
> Doing nightly backups from cron is an *extremely* common use-case of rsync, > and > telling each and every user of rsync that they should either A) write their > own > shell script to filter and discard error messages, or B) play a constant game > of whack-a-mole chasing down new --exclude opt

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3653] Reduce the need for the "vanished files" warning

2010-10-01 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3653 j...@jwz.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||j...@jwz.org --- Comment #17 from j..

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3653] Reduce the need for the "vanished files" warning

2009-05-18 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3653 r...@golder.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||r...@golder.org --- Comment #16 fr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3653] Reduce the need for the "vanished files" warning

2009-04-22 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3653 --- Comment #15 from o...@yadan.net 2009-04-22 03:51 CST --- I ended up using the following script for snapback2 (which exits with the same error codes as rsync if rsync fails: # cat /etc/cron.daily/snapback2 #! /bin/sh OUT=`/usr/bin/sn

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3653] Reduce the need for the "vanished files" warning

2009-04-22 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3653 --- Comment #14 from rv-rsyncbugzi...@eychenne.org 2009-04-22 03:39 CST --- I also find this warning annoying, I really vote for this patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are rec

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3653] Reduce the need for the "vanished files" warning

2008-07-14 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3653 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #1