https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2240
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2240
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-25 10:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=985)
--> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=985&action=view)
Add optional last-match parsing
Here's a simple patch that allows any
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2240
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-25 10:05 ---
I considered the short-circuit operators (-! and +!) for filter commands, but I
am not convinced of their utility. Do you have an example of a real-life
situation that
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2240
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-15 14:47 ---
Ops, yes, you're right. Sorry, my fault in assuming the whole time
that we want to use the usual "out to in" way of describing the
include/exclude list. Certainly a wron
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2240
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-15 11:04 ---
Please explain why the following reversed list and the current first-match
algorithm don't accomplish the same thing as the last-match example you cited:
- dir2/dir22/
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2240
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-15 08:35 ---
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I'm not totally sure what you mean by "arbitrary nesting of matches", but
>> I'll
>> assume that you're talking abou
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2240
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2240
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-13 07:48 ---
Created an attachment (id=887)
--> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=887&action=view)
rsync.patch.lastmatch
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.
