y-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
> > To unsubscribe or change options:
> > https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
> > Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
--
wwp
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
/system :)). Doing the tests multiple times during the day may make
> it more convincing to state your case.
Wouldn't disk-read and disk-write speeds explain or hide the difference
sometimes, if Srinivasa does the reverse test (exchange server and client
machines, perform the same test)? Eve
ync?
> > Have the
> > disparities between the two versions been resolved?
>
> I am using cwrsync and it runs fine connecting to
> Slackware server.
[snip]
Same here, no problem w/ cwrsync -> rsync.
BTW, I even use a minimalist Qt frontend:
http://www.mollux.org/projec
only
including C:\My documents, and of course half of the files are not backed up
because of too-long-path-name, which is really annoying.
Couldn't rsync trick this and do exactly what you suggested from the user
(re-locate itself much deeper in the directory tree so that the relative
options from the GUI. It runs on GNU/Linux and
Windows+cygwin (if you have a Qt3 license, since I did not port it yet to
Qt4), and mostly provides a graphical way to use --include and --exclude,
allows testing before performing backup, log and settings save, etc.
Regards,
--
wwp
--
To unsubsc
