The advantage of rsync is that it saves tons of bandwidth by sending only
the changes.
For your use case, why not just use "scp -r" instead of rsync?
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Andre Majorel wrote:
> Is there a way to make rsync unconditionally transfer files,
> i.e. create them anew eve
+1! :)
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 6:33 AM, Bagwill, Robert H. wrote:
> For me, rsync is an indispensable tool. I don't know what I'd do without
> it.
> Rsync and OpenSSH make our open systems possible.
>
> Of course, we wouldn't NEED them so much if we had better distributed file
> systems,
> bu
he same
across our shared servers. Is it possible that something changed on the
remote server?
"""
So I'm not sure what to look at next. Is there an easy way to install
version X.Y.Z of rsync on a debian system?
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Fr
e a way to tell rsync to not use the 3.0.7-version-specific setting?
Or, is there an /etc/apt/sources.list entry that would get us a more modern
rsync?
--
will trillich -- http://faq.serensoft.com/
"The truth is that many people set rules to keep
from making decisions." -- Mike Krzyzewski
