Re: [librsync-users] MD4 second-preimage attack

Hi, On 2006-03-01 18:29, Donovan Baarda wrote: > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=29760&max_rows=25&style=flat&viewmonth=200404&viewday=5 > > If I understand correctly, provided we add random seeds for blocksums, > these weaknesses would only make attack case 4) easier. It i

Re: MD4 second-preimage attack

On 2006-02-21 16:09, Martin Pool wrote: > Could you please forward this into the bug tracker so it's not lost? Done: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1436299&group_id=56125&atid=479439 https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1436301&group_id=56125&atid=4