Not removing source files when using --remove-source-files

I have rsync -rvz --prune-empty-dirs --remove-source-files --log-file="rsync.log" --backup -e 'ssh' -f'- Saved/*' -f'- Screenshots/*' -f'- Boondocks/*' -f'- Dilbert/*' -f'+ */' -f'+ /*' -f'+ *.jp*g' -f'+ *.png' -f'+ *.nef' -f'+ *.gif' -f'- *' linuxuser@10.0.0.11:/home/linuxuser/Pictures/ /mnt/c/use

Re: Is there a better way to transfer data that doesn't use so much cache?

I've decided to rewrite the script and use cp and mv rather than rsync. In the past, I've had some lost data using just cp and mv which is why I moved to rsync to put the data into a staging directory. Now that I've been creating more data (newer cameras with higher megapixel files and more files

Is there a better way to transfer data that doesn't use so much cache?

I've created a script that syncs (and removes) data from as many as 4 places and puts them all in one of 2 directories. The commands are: rsync -avt --progress --remove-source-files --info=progress2 -f'+ *.nef' -f'+ *.jp*g' -f'+ *.tif' -f'+ *.xmp' -f'+ /*' -f'- *' "$D850/DCIM/100ND850/" $STAGINGP

Re: Syncing multiple sub-directories to one directory

them! On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 6:20 PM Rob Campbell wrote: > My deepest apologies. I had an inotify running that anytime something was > added to that directory it would run a script that was doing my original > sync of pulling in all the directories and images. After turning that off, &

Re: Syncing multiple sub-directories to one directory

much and again, I apologize for mistakenly stating the code you provided didn't work. ~ When you are principled, set standards and stick to them some people will fall out of your life; let them! On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 10:46 PM Rob Cam

Re: Syncing multiple sub-directories to one directory

Except some of those dir have subdir such as WhatsApp and DCIM has multiple subdirs too. I would rather do it all with rsync though. On Wed, Sep 30, 2020, 12:54 PM Wayne Davison wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 4:46 PM Rob Campbell wrote: > >> Thanks for your help. What you pro

Re: Syncing multiple sub-directories to one directory

name '*.dng' -o -iname '*.raw' -o -iname '*.raw' \) -exec rsync -uz --progress "{}" /my/backup/directory/for/images/ \; ~ When you are principled, set standards and stick to them some people will fall out of your life; let them! On Tue,

Syncing multiple sub-directories to one directory

I would like to sync many subdirectories into one directory with no subdirectories. I've tried rsync -rv --progress --include '*.jp*g' --include '*.png' --include '*.dng' --include '*.raw' --include '*.nef' --include 'Duo' --include 'DCIM' --include 'WhatsApp' --exclude '*' /my/phone/root/dir/ /my

Will rsync adopt Kerberos integration?

rsync + rsyncd approach with a connection that can pass user credentials through using an established central security infrastructure. Regards, Rob. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman

FW: rsync hanging after working reliably for years on one of my shares

ress and the nightly mysql dump). No drastic changes in file size. Stumped... Adding the /var/www share back in...hangs again... Ideas? --Rob From: Rob J. Caskey Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 9:21 AM To: 'rsync@lists.samba.org' Subject: rsync hanging after working reliably for years on one

rsync hanging after working reliably for years on one of my shares

ting out there indefinitely long. --Rob pollChild(0) /var/lib/backuppc/pc/luna.aha/900/f%2fvar%2fwww/fwww.athenshousing.org/fxmlrpc.php cache = , invalid = , phase = 0 Sending csums for www.athenshousing.org/xmlrpc.php (size=294) pollChild(0) Sending: acf531d26f1c50f1366757a80100d5d75332c5e7e75a6d Sen

Re: --recursive and -H

nsfer, just its efficiency" Big props to those who code RSYNC, this stuff gets crazy ;) -Rob -- Rob Thompson, Systems Analyst Enterprise Applications Computing & Information Technology Wayne State University phone: 313-577-5645 im: ab5...@yahoo.com Public Key: http://pgp.wayne.edu/

--recursive and -H

tly running is actually preserving hard links, or if I'm going to see in a few days that it is not actually preserving them? Thanks, -Rob -- Rob Thompson, Systems Analyst Enterprise Applications Computing & Information Technology Wayne State University phone: 313-577-5645 im: ab5...@yah

Re: installing rsync-3-0-5 on a Mac

Mike, I stand corrected and educated. I think I have some work to do on my own machine. Rob On Feb 25, 2009, at 12:42 PM, Mike Bombich wrote: On Feb 25, 2009, at 12:00 PM, Rob Rye wrote: The following note never went through yesterday for some reason: You probably know all of this

Re: installing rsync-3-0-5 on a Mac

ot; anything with regard to rsync and reinstalls it you have to rename it again, if you use solution 1... which can be a pain in the neck. --Rob On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 20:21 +0100, Kurt wrote: > is "rsync --version" reporting the wrong version number, or am I to > stup

RE: Question on "Resource temporarily unavailable" error

I've removed the file from the destination machine and still received the error. When I disabled the preallocate option it worked. I suspect there is an issue in the cygwin preallocate option in 1.7. I'll report it to the cygwin message board. Rob -- Please use reply-all for most

RE: Backup Microsoft Exchange

fast, normally less than 20 seconds on a 70GB data store, to create the shadow copy. Of course, either will work and ntbackup is a much easier way. Rob -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/ma

RE: Backup Microsoft Exchange

your edb in the event of a disaster. If you truncate logs or use circular logging you have to use -I to force a sync even if the date/time has not changed. Rob -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/ma

sporadic issue with lnk file

do not see any filename conflict that would prohibit a rename on the receiver side. The receiver has the file there and has a date/time of the transfer, not date/time to match the origination file. I have the rsync option to update the date/times and they normally match. Just wondering

RE: Question on "Resource temporarily unavailable" error

ccurs again. You're probably right, it may be a hardware issue. Rob On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 14:20 -0600, Rob Bosch wrote: > 2008/09/30 12:09:55 [12508] rsync: write failed on "/EDrive/testfile.edb" > (in Test.Backup):Resource temporarily unavailable (11) That error is comi

Question on "Resource temporarily unavailable" error

[12508] rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (86 bytes received so far) [generator] 2008/09/30 12:09:55 [12508] rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(644) Rob -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change

Re: out of memory in flist_expand

to see if they are too small, and try using a > different compiler or malloc package to see if your malloc is having > trouble with memory fragmentation. I have compiled rsync 3.0.3 with the ptmalloc library (http://www.malloc.de/en/), now it works! Thanks again for your suggestion. --

Re: out of memory in flist_expand

Thanks for your answer... Wayne Davison schreef: > On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 05:28:43PM +0200, Rob klein Gunnewiek wrote: >> ERROR: out of memory in flist_expand [generator] > > With -vv, you should be seeing messages like this: > > [generator] expand file_list pointer array

Re: out of memory in flist_expand

Could someone please help me with this problem? Rob klein Gunnewiek wrote: > Hello list, > > I get the following error using rsync 3.0.3 (both sides): > > ... > data//admin_docs/2/8/9/9/0/7/9/msg-75682-748.msg is uptodate > data//admin_docs/2/8/9/9/0/

out of memory in flist_expand

now 512 MB for a program. In the Rsync FAQ I read Rsync uses approximately 100 bytes per file for indexing. The number of files to copy from the remote server is 3902364, so rsync would need about 400MB... right? Both sides run FreeBSD 6.x, and rsync 3.0.3. What am I missing? -- Rob klein Gun

Re: rsync operation times out on excluded directory

Wayne Davison schreef: > On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 10:53:34AM +0200, Rob klein Gunnewiek wrote: >> However, even though I exclude this directory, rsync still attempts to >> access it: > > [..] > > In the meantime, there your options are: (1) exclude the parent dir >

rsync operation times out on excluded directory

s there a solution? Other than lazy-unmounting the NFS filesystem? -- Rob klein Gunnewiek BWSS B.V. Deventer (http://www.bwss.nl) Tel +(31) 0570-665140 Fax +(31) 0570-665141 -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https:

Re: Large file - match process taking days

efault (in this case, 262144). I'm continuing to test to find the "best" blocksize for these types of files. I'm just sending this info for future reference for those using rsync for large Exchange files or other database files. Rob -- Please use reply-all for most replies to av

RE: Feature request - timestamp with -v higher than 3

er to keep it in the scripts I use today...good idea though. Rob -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

RE: Large file - match process taking days

data versus the checksum. Based on what I see in the logs it is taking forever to do the checksum process. Or am I misunderstanding the log? Rob -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/lis

RE: Large file - match process taking days

out 287000 (default square root) to 1149728. Rob -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Large file - match process taking days

o long to go through this portion of the sync process? Rsync version is 3.0.3 on both ends. Rob -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb

Feature request - timestamp with -v higher than 3

uot; which isn't really feasible on 80GB files. It would be helpful if the additional logging (or all logging) included a timestamp (optional?) on the output if the verbosity level is above X, where X is 3? Especially in the match.c code segment. Just my 2 cents. Rob -- Please use reply-a

Remote Differential Compression comparative run

ygwin for both the client and server with the preallocate patch applied. I'm not sure this is a fair comparison given the rudimentary application used for RDC but it sure looks like rsync blows away RDC. Rob -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsu

RE: maximum block-size (-B) parameter

The maximum value allowed was 128KB. I think this is an issue with cygwin (using 1.7.6 for testing) and how it interprets an int32. I've modified the define value from the int32 and put in an upper limit instead to test. Just an FYI in case someone else has this issue. Rob -- Pleas

maximum block-size (-B) parameter

32, passing 16MB or 1MB or 512KB should not be a problem, right? Rob -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Directory with ! in filename

I'm still using 3.0.0pre10. rsync: opendir "/cygdrive/j/Documents and Settings/All Users/Start Menu/Programs/ACT! 2006 " failed: No such file or directory (2) Thanks! Rob -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read:

Re: Passed all tests with flying colors on Mac OS X 10.4.11 - synopsis of installation and testing

ned crtimes and 'went back' to osx- create-time.diff Thanks for the heads up on the order of the patches. Rob On Mar 3, 2008, at 4:41 PM, Anthony Morton wrote: I am running MacOS X 10.4.11 on PPC. The following is a synopsis of my installation procedure (as gathered from the v

Passed all tests with flying colors on Mac OS X 10.4.11 - synopsis of installation and testing

such testing on a backup utility/app. So, I am thrilled to have a fully functional, modern, backup app for my Mac without having gone through the heartaches inherent in participating in the testing. Cheers, Rob -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/list

RE: Fragmentation on XFS

Wayne, thanks for your help on this issue. It turned out to be a user error (me) since the client was the pre5 client instead of the pre10. I reran the test with the pre10 client as you suggested and here are the results. The only odd thing I noticed is that even though all the data matched, the

Re: Fragmentation on XFS

Let me know of any additional info or tests you need me to run. I'll halp any way I can. thanks. rob -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

RE: Fragmentation on XFS

he file rsync can look across to find a match? I noticed the previous run had a huge number of false_alarms and a negative number for hash_hits. Does this point to where the problem may be? Rob === rsync -I --no-whole-file --port=888 -vv --compress-level=9 --stats '/cygdrive/e/work data/t

RE: Fragmentation on XFS

I ran rsync on the 59GB file again without preallocate on XFS. It created only 383 extents...very low fragmentation. Rob -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

RE: Fragmentation on XFS

> A local transfer needs --no-whole-file if you want it to use the rsync > algorithm (which uses more disk I/O, so it's not the default). > >..wayne.. I reran this test with the --no-whole-file option and received the exact same results. Any idea on why some much data is being sent when the files

RE: Fragmentation on XFS

reliability (we were getting crashes due to driver problems under Windows). Rob -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

RE: Fragmentation on XFS

like fallocate if supported in the kernel). Given that solved the problem I didn't pursue any other alternatives. Rob -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

RE: Fragmentation on XFS

n. In that world it is a must have since it increases performance on the reads by orders of magnitude while not impacting the write-side since the cygwin posix_fallocate is very efficient. Rob -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read

RE: Fragmentation on XFS

> A local transfer needs --no-whole-file if you want it to use the rsync > algorithm (which uses more disk I/O, so it's not the default). The transfers occurred across a local network but were on separate machines. Rob -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.

RE: Fragmentation on XFS

s running at the same time. I suspect this concurrency is causing the additional extents since many processes writing to the same disk array. I thought only 1235 extents without posix_fallocate was pretty good. Under cygwin and NTFS, an equivalent file was generating around 25000 extents. Rob

RE: Fragmentation on XFS

Both the ftruncate and posix_fallocate runs have exactly the same stats which makes sense. Resending 38GB of the data doesn't make sense. Rob -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

RE: Fragmentation on XFS

On Sat, 2008-02-23 at 16:43 -0700, Rob Bosch wrote: >In your patch, you should use fallocate in place of ftruncate. If your >glibc is like mine and doesn't provide direct access to fallocate, >you'll have to use syscall and __NR_fallocate . I'll run a test with both

Fragmentation on XFS

see if it makes sense to you, Matt, since you developed it. I don't have the skills to do the modifications to check for cygwin versus another distribution to determine if posix_fallocate should be used versus ftruncate. Again, sorry for any duplication of posts. Rob -Original Messag

RE: preallocate CPU usage - pre4

should be preallocate-linux.diff? Rob preallocate.diff Description: Binary data -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

FW: Error code 23, delete failed, error 0

--compress-level=9 --links --ignore-case --ignore-errors --stats --del --exclude-from=/cygdrive/c/DiffExclude.log Patches: Using the preallocate.diff and ignore-case.diff patches from the rsync-patches tarball for 3.0.0pre8. FYI, I was getting this issue on pre5 and still getting it with pre8. Rob

Error code 23, delete failed, error 0

s not exist. Just trying to understand why this would cause a non-zero exit code. Rob -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

RE: Compiling with --disable-iconv

Sorry, didn't see the matching if statement. Commenting out the two lines with ICONV in the config.h fixed my issue. Thanks... Rob -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

RE: Compiling with --disable-iconv

e how the ic_chck = iconv_open(defset, defset); (line 83) can be impacted by these options. I have a feeling some of this is a function of the cygwin compile environment that I'm using but it seems I should be able to define these parameters as 0 and get rsync to compile without iconv. R

RE: Compiling with --disable-iconv

The error on 193 is due to the iconv reference in the while loop.Rob /usr/src/rsync-3.0.0pre8/rsync.c:85: undefined reference to `_iconv_open' rsync.o: In function `iconvbufs':/usr/src/rsync-3.0.0pre8/rsync.c:193: undefined reference to `_iconv'/usr/src/rsync-3.0.0pre8/rsync.c:163: undefined

Compiling with --disable-iconv

ld returned 1 exit statusmake: *** [rsync.exe] Error 1 It looks like the line 85 and 163 are not conditionalized for the --disable-iconv option. I'm not sure why line 193 is showing the error. Any suggestions? Am I missing something (as usual)?Rob -- To unsubscribe or change options: https

RE: --partial replaces destination file on interrupted transfer

I guess a quick read of the man page would have resolved this. Thanks for the tip. Rob -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

--partial replaces destination file on interrupted transfer

CentOS 5 Full client command line options: -ruvity --partial --super --ignore-case --ignore-errors --stats --delete-during --exclude-from=DiffExclude.txt Rob -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart

Workaround for ACL and file attributes

will have all the information required to restore the files to the original state in 3 simple text files. I use these types of simple steps to work around capturing ACL's and attributes. It also provides me with a very reliable way of restoring the files I backed up. It never hurts to have t

files already downloaded; rsync reporting "permission denied"

Windows-XP; rsync-2.6.9; ant-1.6.5; java-1.[45] rsync supply is on a linux box: rev-2.6.3 The file set in question has already been downloaded in its entirety successfully by rsync. A follow-on rsync (a potential update) fails with this message: [exec] rsync: rename "/c/module/82/.module.j

RE: preallocate CPU usage - pre4

> Attached is the C++ source for a simple program "allocate" to allocate a > file. Call the > program like "./allocate thefile 770". Now that was fun. I was creating 300GB files with no fragmentation in less than 1/2 a second! Seriously, the performance using the program was identica

RE: preallocate CPU usage - pre4

e data on it. If you send me a simple program to compile I'll test that too. Thanks for your response and support on this patch!! Rob -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

preallocate CPU usage - pre4

der Linux. The preallocate is working, it just is taking a while to create the file. Rob -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Building hash table times for large files

I'm running pre4 on a 77GB file. It seems like the hash table is taking a long time to be built. I'm not sure what is involved in this step but as an example the following is logged during a run: send_files(11, priv1.edb) send_files mapped priv1.edb of size 79187419136 calling match_sums priv1

Re: symlinks that become directories question

ry drive failure, used in a bare metal restore situation, I believe leaving off "--keep-dirlinks" will not cause any problems, as the symlinks that point to directories on the primary drive will still be intact on the backup drive, and can be restored "as is" on a restore, correct? We don't need rsync to follow the symlink, as we're already backing up all the data on the OS. Rob -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

symlinks that become directories question

lawed in using rsync with the command above to produce a mirror copy of an entire server to a backup drive? Thanks. Rob -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

RE: rsync error: STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION

That appears to have been the problem. I pulled the latest CVS version and the backup passed the same point and is still running. If I get another failure I'll post it back. Thanks Matt! Rob -Original Message- From: Matt McCutchen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt McCu

rsync error: STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION

I received the following error on the client when testing the pre2 release. I'm not sure what it means or if it helps. Rsync 2.6.9 runs the same backup without error. I compiled rsync under cygwin CVS so it may be an issue there as well. Server side did not crash. It did log an error, but I'm p

Attributes on Windows files - not ACL

I'm wondering why I'm having trouble getting attributes like Hidden or System to come across from my Windows rsync under cygwin implementation (2.6.9). I'm using rsync via an ssh tunnel from one Windows machine to the other, rsync version 2.6.9. The options I'm using are -ruvitpAE --super --preal

RE: File Fragmentation issue...especially relating to NTFS...

OK, sounds like completely different scenarios. We haven't been using rsync locally to do copies or things like that. -Original Message- From: Linda Walsh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 2:42 PM To: Rob Bosch Cc: 'Matt McCutchen'; 'rsyn

RE: File Fragmentation issue...especially relating to NTFS...

rategies though so please post what you find out! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt McCutchen Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 8:52 AM To: Linda Walsh Cc: Rob Bosch; rsync Subject: Re: File Fragmentation issue...especially relating to NTFS

Re: Clarification on the RSYNC_RAW_STATUS and RSYNC_EXIT_STATUS

post the client result. This covers us in there is a drop in the remote link. Anyway, thanks! Rob "Wayne Davison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 11:13:04AM -0600, Rob Bosch wrote: > > I've noticed that e

Re: Clarification on the RSYNC_EXIT_STATUS

Wayne answered in my separate post...ignore this message. Rob "Rob Bosch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > I'm guessing no one else has seen this issue? Most exit codes are properly > reported (e.g. code 12, code 10, code 2).

Clarification on the RSYNC_EXIT_STATUS

properly and captured in the environment variable there).  The exit code of the server still shows an exit code of zero.  Any comments or ideas on what I may be doing wrong?    Also, if anyone has comments on what section the code sets the environment variable errors I’d appreciate it…thanks.   Rob

RE: code 23 error.

ame is too long or the directory specified in the backup set doesn't exist. I'm sure there are others. Take a look at the full output of rsync and you should be able to find the reason. Rob -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before

RE: post-xfer exec -- more juice!

matching the modulename and pull in the request value to get the path. A bit of a hack but it has worked for us to track all open connections to the rsync server and create a database of exit codes by module (user surrogate in our world) and path. Rob -- To unsubscribe or change options: https

Clarification on the RSYNC_RAW_STATUS and RSYNC_EXIT_STATUS

server experience an error that the rsync_raw_status or the rsync_exit_status should represent the same value, right? Rob -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

RSYNC_ARG# question

e. I'd like to be able to track the remote directory being used. Is this possible? Am I missing something (and no, it wouldn't be the first time). Rob -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Re: File fragmentation

Wayne…my vote is for a command-line option.  I’ve noticed there is some penalty for very large files (35GB-50GB).  The penalty is relatively small based on my ‘intuitive’ measurements…read me watching without running a real timer.  The difference is very small compared to what happens after a few w

Re: File fragmentation

Wayne…my vote is for a command-line option.  I’ve noticed there is some penalty for very large files (35GB-50GB).  The penalty is relatively small based on my ‘intuitive’ measurements…read me watching without running a real timer.  The difference is very small compared to what happens after

RE: File fragmentation

That would be great! If you need any help testing, let me know. Rob -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt McCutchen Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 6:15 PM To: Rob Bosch Cc: rsync Subject: Re: File fragmentation On 8/25/06, Rob Bosch

RE: File fragmentation

le...seems convoluted. I wonder how the copy feature does it. Not sure if this helps at all or not. I couldn't find anything else in the create file functions that allow a parameter to define the file size. Rob -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Beh

RE: File fragmentation

PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt McCutchen Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 6:59 PM To: Rob Bosch Cc: rsync@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: File fragmentation On 8/6/06, Rob Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was wondering why rsync doesn't preallocate the space like copy > or othe

RE: Invalid File Index error

Testing with an updated version of cygwin (1.5.21) proved to resolve the problem.  Thanks Tev!!!   Rob   From: Tevfik Karagülle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 3:36 PM To: 'Rob Bosch'; rsync@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Invalid File I

RE: Invalid File Index error

Good plan…I’ll test that now and post my results.   From: Tevfik Karagülle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 3:36 PM To: 'Rob Bosch'; rsync@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Invalid File Index error   cwRsync version 2.0.8 uses newer versions

Invalid File Index error

Since upgrading to 2.6.8 with the tag 3 patch, I’ve been consistently getting an error using rsync.  We have about 100 servers using the client to a central backup server and the issue is repeatable on the servers having the problem.  About 10 of the servers are having the problem.  The err

File fragmentation

I've been running some tests on files created by rsync and noticing fragmentation issues. I started the testing because our 5TB array started performing very slowly and it appears fragmentation was the culprit. The test I conducted was straighforward: 1. Copy over a 49GB file. Analyzed wit

Why does my cwrsync try to load ssh?

e removed all other traces of cygwin from this system. At one point I think I did experiment with OpenSSH for Windows on this machine but I can find no remaining trace of that either. All help appreciated and sorry for the newbie idiocy :-( Cheers Rob -- To unsubscribe or change

RE: Deleted files

rsync limits? Thanks, Rob Walls -Original Message- From: jw schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 5:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Deleted files On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 05:04:00PM -0700, Walls Rob W Contr 75 CS/SCBS wrote: > Thought my trouble

Deleted files

ot be deleted, because they haven't changed. Files eventually get back in sync. I can't figure out why they are deleted in the first place. Any ideas on what to check? Rob Walls -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http

RE: Erratic Trouble rsyncing between windows share and linux

spect that rsync was working fine, but there must be some odd subtleties in file attributes or even file size issues in the way I'm feeding rsync the source directory. Rob Walls -Original Message- From: Walls Rob W Contr 75 CS/SCBS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 17,

Erratic Trouble rsyncing between windows share and linux

syntax is the same. The source directory I'm having problems with has 100,000+ files and is about 4.5Gb total size. Does anyone have any ideas as to why this is not working using a samba share? Rob Walls -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before post

Re: globbing doesn't work locally

You wrote: >On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 03:37:21PM -0700, Rob McMillin wrote: >> This is on rsync v2.4.5 on RedHat 7.3. >> >> If I do something like >> >> rsync ... 'somehost:/path/to/files.*' /local/path >> >> it works fine, but if I do >

globbing doesn't work locally

This is on rsync v2.4.5 on RedHat 7.3. If I do something like rsync ... 'somehost:/path/to/files.*' /local/path it works fine, but if I do rsync ... '/local/path/to/files.*' somehost:/path/to globbing fails, yielding an error about being unable to find a file named 'files.*': link_stat

Re: restricting rsync over ssh on the server side.

it in action, but it'd be nice to have a general overview rather than just investigating via trial and error. If there aren't really any docs, then when I get around to it I can just go check the source. Thanks again. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org

Re: restricting rsync over ssh on the server side.

options that might open up security holes unless the developers were keeping the ssh wrapper usage in mind, or unless the wrapper were maintained as a part of rsync. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org Previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14

Re: restricting rsync over ssh on the server side.

or not to allow and attempt the operation. duplicity-ssh-agent will probably accept the "put" files on stdin, return the "get" files on stdout, and return as much error information as needed on standard error. FWIW -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, a

  1   2   >